Showing posts with label Writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Writing. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 28, 2026

Two Completed Categories:
Adapted Screenplay and Original Score

Welcome to the end of the first week of Oscar nominations! 

Have you made your checklists? Have you added up your totals of how many you need to see?  Have you lamented the fact that unless you are in Southern California you might not get to see Viva Verdi before the ceremony?  Have you asked yourself why you haven't yet moved back to Southern California?  I have done all of these things!

As of nominations morning, I already had two completed categories. 

Adapted Screenplay
Bugonia
Frankenstein
Hamnet
One Battle After Another 
Train Dreams 

Original Score
Bugonia
Frankenstein
Hamnet
One Battle After Another
Sinners


Similar nominees! Let's see what separates them, and what we think. 

First of all, I'll make it clear from the outset this year that I am a full-fledged member of #TeamBugonia. I love it, and I absolutely love it.  It is the best thing Emma & Yorgos have done, by far.  I was getting a little tired of their cinematic antics and when the Lanthimos-directed Poor Things earned Emma Stone another Oscar a couple years ago I was miserable; I loathed that flick. And I was dreading Bugonia, and my expectations couldn't have been lower as I grudgingly headed into the theatre back in November. Much to my pleasant surprise, it was fantastic.  I will be thrilled if it wins anything, although I don't know that it will. More on that as we move through the season. 

On the other hand, I am completely not buying the hype for One Battle After Another.  Yes, it was wild and had moments of hilarity and serious themes and staggering sequences and great performances. It was also interminable. I call it One Scene After Another. Enough. 

Adapted Screenplay is an interesting category. As much as Bugonia is my favorite of the five films, I don't know if it's the best adaptation of previously published material. It is based on a Korean movie, Save the Green Planet!  For this category, I think about what it took to take the prior work and turn it into this work, and in that sense I think there are two other strong contenders, both of which I also like immensely, Hamnet and Train Dreams

Hamnet is a wonderful, earthy, lovely, witchy, gritty, literary book that I found to be such a clever re-imagining of what led to Hamlet,  and the film was beautifully faithful to the book while giving us a glorious cinematic experience.  I am 100% OK with Hamnet winning everything, too. 

Train Dreams is a slight, odd novella that I read last year in anticipation of then-months-off Awards Season, and when I read it I thought it might work better as a film. I now agree with myself. The book is barely more than an idea, but the movie is another earthy, gritty, quietly powerful bit of art that rewards quiet contemplative viewing.  Did you see it?  What did you think? 

And Frankenstein?  Again, not so much the screenplay moved me here as Guillermo del Toro's weird and wondrous and lush filmmaking vision.  But it was beautiful and bookended well, with lots of great choices -- and his films don't always necessarily land for me, either, but this one surely did. 

And then there's Original Score, which is always hard for me to decide short of a true marvel (for example, The Brutalist last year or Gladiator more than two decades ago) because I honestly sometimes forget to pay attention.  When I contemplate these nominees now, I have to think back to how I was ushered through the film.  And honestly, all of them are fine, although it is unnecessary to reward One Battle After Another here. The music of Sinners was absolutely a huge part of it, but not necessarily because of the Original Score. It's possible that Sinners, a stunning movie, will pick up a slew of awards including this one. But the same can be said for Hamnet.  Will Bugonia and Frankenstein be shut out? 

Order I want the Adapted Screenplay nominees to win from my #1 pick to no thanks: 
Train Dreams, Hamnet, Bugonia, Frankenstein, One Battle After Another
Order I think they will win, if you'd like my help in your Oscar pool (ha!): 
Hamnet, One Battle After Another, Bugonia, Train Dreams, Frankenstein 

Order I want the Original Score nominees to win: 
Bugonia, Hamnet, Sinners or Frankenstein, One Battle After Another 
Order I think they will win (although I'm really truly not sure): 
Sinners, Hamnet, One Battle After Another, Frankenstein, Bugonia 


Well, that's two categories done out of 24! 
How about you? 
Is your Oscar nominee viewing off to a good start? 


Wednesday, February 19, 2025

Completed Category: Original Screenplay

I love to think about the Screenplay categories! In fact, I want one of my next checklist projects to be: Watch All the Nominated Screenplay Films Ever.  That will take a while. In the meantime, this year: 

Original Screenplay
ANORA
Written by Sean Baker
THE BRUTALIST
Written by Brady Corbet, Mona Fastvold
A REAL PAIN
Written by Jesse Eisenberg
SEPTEMBER 5
Written by Moritz Binder, Tim Fehlbaum; Co-Written by Alex David
THE SUBSTANCE
Written by Coralie Fargeat

I only just this week completed this category because I had September 5 lingering for a while simply because #IAmVeryBusy and also I knew it was easily available to rent on demand as opposed to some others in which one must still be in pursuit* and so I knew I'd get around to it as soon as I could get around to it. 

*This year, we're looking in pursuit at you, Porcelain War. And with Ukraine having become a daily news story this week, at that! Every damn year, we are forced to go through this with one or two nominated flicks - a refusal by the distributor to, ya know, distribute the film during the two months between Oscar nominations and Oscar ceremony. It's so fckng stupid, every damn year. It's like - "Hi! We want to give you our money! Please take it in exchange for a streaming rental  of your film!"   "No."  "OK well, could you have it play in theatres across the country/world?"  "No."  "Hmm, well, we really want to see it? Can we please? Remember, we are trying to pay you for this. Money for your film! Isn't that what you wanted?"   "Why oh why is the film industry dying nobody goes to movies why oh why won't they see my film i weep i wail i gnash my teeth why oh why!"  "Um..er..." 

Anyway, that was a tangent about a totally different category. Back in Screenplay-land, September 5 is available, and I paid for a streaming rental and watched it! Amazing how that works! I enjoyed the movie and thought it was well done, everyone all tightly crammed in the control room and whatnot. I was also like, hey! I know her! about the actress playing translator and much more Marianne - not a real person, a composite character - as she starred in last year's International nominee The Teachers' Lounge.  Good for her, Oscar-ing it up two years in a row.  I think this screenplay fully and completely did its job, keeping you interested and invested, while laying out and guiding you through the story, but I am pretty sure it will not win, as people are heavily invested in voting for some of its competition. 

The Brutalist is going to get votes, in this and in other categories. I think it is going to get more votes in other categories.  First of all this thing is long and it pummels you, and I mean, as a story it's fine and all (if a little bit terribly intense) but its strengths are more so in the Directing, Cinematography, Score, and other elements of its pummeling you for four hours of your life.  We could possibly see it sweep all its nominations, but I don't think so. Don't worry, you're still the Brutal-est screenplay. 

Although I've gotta say, The Substance almost gives ya a run for yer money in the brutal department!  The Substance  is glorious and crazy and ridiculous and socio-philosophical and wonderful and I love it. That being said, the ending where it gets a little shaky (or splattery) before bringing it all home is its weakest point. I still love it and I forgive it all its flaws and won't mind even a tiny bit if it DOES win here - and it does have a chance - but I think we have to seriously reckon with the other two competing nominees. 

A Real Pain accurately describes its character played by Kieran Culkin, who is likely to win Supporting Actor for his co-starring lead role. This is a typically perfect kind of Screenplay winner: indie vibes, but famous people, and interesting content that raises some socio-political questions, and also fun. I personally related immensely to this film, because I too took a trip to Poland as an adult and met up with a group of other adults (on a Habitat for Humanity build) and then took a week by myself to go see my great-grandparents' hometown. So I was nostalgia-loving this in addition to being entertained by it. The only annoying thing about this film is its accurately described title (lead!) character, whom you want to throttle. Screenwriter (and co-star) Jesse Eisenberg just won the BAFTA, too, and had no speech written, he said, because he didn't think he would win. True? Maybe. A Real Pain had all the buzz for quite a while. What overtook it? 

A film that had even earlier buzz, then cooled a bit, but has surged back even more since nominations day: Anora. This thing is a well-done screenplay of misfit friends, another title character who comes into situations like a wrecking ball (but is met with other wrecking ball types who outdo her in that department), surprising scenarios, an ante that gets upped a few times, and the edginess that people love to love in their films. I personally walked away from Anora shaking my head and wondering #WhyAreMen, but the sex-work-is-work prostitution apologists will be out in droves making sure that question doesn't get too much attention to distract us from the feel-good train wreck of Anora

Order I want them to win: A Real Pain, September 5, The Substance, Anora or The Brutalist

Order I think they will win: Anora, A Real Pain, The Substance, then a gap and then The Brutalist, September 5. 

This is too close to call.  But I do think the bolder Anora might succeed here.
Which one do you think will win? 

Thursday, February 06, 2025

Completed Category: Adapted Screenplay

I completed another category this week! My tenth completed for this year's Oscar noms. 

Adapted Screenplay
A Complete Unknown - James Mangold and Jay Cocks 
Conclave - Peter Straughan
Emilia Perez - Jacques Audiard collaboration w/ Thomas Bidegain, Lea Mysius, Nicolas Livecchi
Nickel Boys - RaMell Ross and Joslyn Barnes    
Sing Sing -   Clint Bentley, Greg Kwedar, w/story also by Clarence Maclin, John Divine G Whitfield 

I love to think about the Screenplay categories each year, and I often seek out the source material for the Adapted category.  I read Conclave  a few months ago specifically based on early/summer awards buzz, and I read Nickel Boys last year too, although I would have done that anyway because it won a Pulitzer. 

I have NOT yet read Dylan Goes Electric! on which A Complete Unknown was somewhat based, nor the Esquire article that Sing Sing was adapted from about the prisoners' real-life story and the Rehabilitation Through the Arts program. 

As for the living, breathing, walking, talking, singing mess that is Emilia Perez,  we are apparently considering the screenplay to be based on the opera libretto that the writer/director wrote - because yes, he originally conceived this as an opera, which means it actually could have been even worse. I know, hard to believe - and that libretto was based on a character from a chapter of some book, and anyway, don't worry, we do not need to be seeking out any of this. 

Conclave is awesome! I liked the book, it's a fictional story, it's not an affront to the Catholic church, did I mention it's fiction, and as I've been saying for months since I read the book, you won't be getting any spoilers from me!  But even knowing everything that would happen, I still enjoyed the film and felt the requisite emotions, including tension, excitement, dismay, etc.  Great screenplay and great flick. I am so happy it has a chance to win! 

I won't be mad if A Complete Unknown wins either, though, as it was also an excellent film, and it distilled a complex story and coming together of people into a solid narrative that was well structured and well executed.  I would be perfectly fine with A Complete Unknown sweeping every single category in which it's nominated, actually, because my strongest feelings about other films are for categories in which A Complete Unknown is not nominated. 

Sing Sing probably won't win here, because it seems to be under the radar a little bit, and I think the performances of the ensemble are what made it soar, not necessarily the screenplay. I don't mean anything against it; it did its work well. 

Emilia Perez is a mess, as previously mentioned. There might be some spoilers herein; be warned. Nothing about it makes sense (least of all, why does it exist, and why must they sing) but for real - why can't he find a surgeon? why does he need the lawyer to do that? why are we expected to believe that ANY of the second half would/could happen?  does anyone think you could just start up that non-profit?  or that cartels would suddenly be hands off because they supposedly "don't know who you are"? or that people wouldn't know who you are?  not to mention all the seriously confused messaging about the so-called transition - are you two people, or not?  were you "always" this "woman" (ha ha, no) or not?  I mean, in some ways that's not the film's fault per se - nothing about any trans ideology makes a lick of sense, so why should it in a musical film about it?  But this screenplay is a mess, much like the finished product film. 

And sadly Nickel Boys, which is not anywhere near as bad, is also kind of a total mess.  I read that book. I found the movie extremely faithful to the book. And that is the only reason I had any idea whatsoever what was happening. I want to avoid spoilers, but honestly, they could only probably help you. While the movie depicts everything that happened in the book, it doesn't actually, like, communicate what's happening. Why is he going to this place? Was he sentenced? Was that explained? In the book it was!  What is happening with this "community service"? Was that explained?  In the book it was! What did the director tell the boy before the boxing match? It sure was explained in the book seeing as it's a  major pivotal plot point, along with what happened after the match as a direct result.  The notebook, the visitors, who was punished, who was where, who lives, who dies, you know, just simple little questions like that that are the whole entire point?  Explained in the book. The movie, not so much.  I'm sorry Nickel Boys, but ... what? 

Order I want them to win: 
A Complete Unknown, Conclave, Sing Sing, please no Emilia Perez, please no Nickel Boys 

Order I think they will win: 
Conclave, A Complete Unknown, and then I don't know. Maybe Sing Sing and then the other two? 

Which screenplays did you like?  


Monday, February 26, 2024

Completed Category: Adapted Screenplay

 Well, I finally saw The Zone of Interest.  And it was a giant disappointment. But I completed four more categories, so there's that.  Guess we'll start here. 


I will be perfectly content if any of three of these films win, and if either of the other two win, I will throw Things at the Zone of the television. 

AMERICAN FICTION: I read that Cord Jefferson is from Arizona! Bonus points to him. Also, he wrote a pretty good screenplay here. The ending is - an interesting choice. I know there are layers upon meta layers, but it still might put off a few people. And of course, some of the fresh wit of this comes from the Percival Everett book it adapted, which I also liked, while the major departures from the book (Boston, the manner of one character's death) I think served the film well, but were those his changes or changes by committee? Also a lot of what I loved about this film was the performances. In general I think this is a good, more-than-solid, A-minus, not quite my first choice. But lots of people will vote for it. 

BARBIE: And a lot of people will vote for this. Greta Gerwig and Noah Baumbach wrote a fun and thoughtful screenplay - yes, based on something that already exists, for one more reminder for those who don't believe the Academy knows how its Original vs Adapted rules work - and Greta also famously directed it to a billion dollars at the box office but wasn't nominated for Directing. I think Barbie has a more than great shot at winning because of both of those things, the not being able to award Greta otherwise AND the fact that it was a good screenplay that saved moviegoing, at least for a little while. So, what's stopping it? 

OPPENHEIMER: Oh. That. Yeah. Oppenheimer was great, it is going to win some Oscars, and this might be one of them. But - Christopher Nolan adapted it from a book (and an actual real life), unlike, say, some of the other brilliant things that have emerged from his mind as Original over the years, which is not to say he didn't do wholly original and brilliant things with it, just that there's a different starting point. Also, more importantly, he will almost surely win Directing, and the film might win a whole lot of stuff, so this category could be where people back off from him and give Gerwig the prize since they're handsomely rewarding Nolan elsewhere. 

See? All three of those have a chance, and make for a super-interesting race.  Unlike...

POOR THINGS: Ugh.  Ugh times one million. Screenwriter Tony McNamara said, and I quote, that he hates "sex scenes for no reason."  Well, Tony, self-aware you are not. Perhaps even worse, he said that he was always failing English class in high school and could never get his head around grammar but wouldja look here, now he's a writer. Ugh. Every single thing about this movie is another check in the Ugh column for me. I know some people are going to vote for him because he wrote words for Bella the franken-baby-mind (discovering sex) and words for Bella the grown-up-mind (roaming around the world getting naked with more people), but my godz do I hope it's just a few people and that I don't have to throw (Poor) Things at the TV when this award is announced. 

THE ZONE OF INTEREST: Now this one is (Zone of) interesting here only because it's utterly baffling to think about how it could possibly garner votes for this category. First of all, it's honestly less of an adapted screenplay than Barbie. It didn't even keep the characters from Martin Amis' book! It took the title and premise and part of the setting and then created an entirely different (lack of) story. The book was a mess in many ways, but this didn't bother trying to improve on it, just said OK literary estate of Martin Amis, thanks for the premise, bye!  Secondly, though, what screenplay we have here is - not much. So it's not as if Jonathan Glazer went and wrote a different story; he wrote instead a kind of art project.  Now, we all know that I do not care for fever dream projects masquerading as cinematic narratives, so this did not work for me in the slightest. But I also think there are objectively major flaws, such as: what's happening here?! in the infrared sequences that come out of nowhere? if Grandma is going to make a stand can you at least tell us about it? can you in fact depict anything that happens at any point?  and what on earth are you trying to say with the ending - that we shouldn't have a museum?  Everything is so unclear but on top of that it's also boring. Was his take on the banality of evil that he could one-up everybody by making the most horrific shocking acts of humanity unfathomably dull?  Seriously, we know this is going to win International (Foreign) film and maybe Sound, but really don't think it's going to win here. 

I'm reluctant to even try to predict but ... who cares, this is all just my personal fever dream blog rantings anyway!  HA.

Order I want them to win: 
Barbie
Oppenheimer
American Fiction
<huge gap>
<chasm>
<the Grand Canyon>
<all of the fabric of space time>
tie for last: Poor Things and The Zone of Interest

Order I think they will win (MAYBE): 
Barbie
American Fiction
Oppenheimer
who cares






Thursday, February 08, 2024

Completed Category: Original Screenplay

 The other category that I completed by seeing The Holdovers last week was Writing - Original Screenplay. 


And in this category, I have a dilemma. You see, I loved Past Lives. I loved it, loved it, loved it.  But I don't think it was the best screenplay - that's not why. It was the feeling, the performances, the mood, and the direction. I was really hoping for Celine Song to shock everyone some people with a Directing nomination. 
Instead, she was nominated for screenplay, while... 

ANATOMY OF A FALL - Justine Triet got a Directing nomination along with her Original Screenplay nod here, which also surprised some people, mostly because she's not Greta Gerwig, but hey, people love Anatomy of a Fall. I also really liked it and would not be mad if it won here. It's talky and gives you lots to think about, both of which I generally like in movies. 

THE HOLDOVERS - You could sort of say the same for The Holdovers.  I love this misfit story quite a bit, and I might want it to win just a bit more than I'd want Anatomy... to win. I think The Holdovers also has a chance: people like it, and they might not be "able" to vote for Paul Giamatti so this would still be a vote for this film, and it's so exactly the kind of movie that gets a Screenplay nomination and I'm so okay with that. 

MAESTRO - This on the other hand?  Not as subtle or understated, and I think not as much of a chance to win this category, as Maestro was also not so much about the Screenplay as about the everything else about it, the boldness, the fantastic performance(s), the big swings it took. I think when people are thinking about the writing of words and crafting of a story, as opposed to the delivery of big scenes and big moments, they aren't going to dwell on Maestro

MAY DECEMBER - But May December? May be. First of all, it did not get any other nominations, despite the prognostication and the wicked good performances, and secondly, it was devilishly good. You are sort of horrified as it goes along at how dearly fucked up every character is, and it's great. It sneaks up on you. I am all for it winning here. 

PAST LIVES - And that is even above what was my favorite film in this category, Past Lives.  Taken as a whole experience, yes, this was far and away my favorite of these five. But I only put it third or fourth of these five for the Original Screenplay award. 

Order I want them to win: 
May December
The Holdovers
Anatomy of a Fall - Past Lives 
(tie. I think.) 
Maestro

Order I think maybe they will win maybe: 
The Holdovers
Anatomy of a Fall
(I might move this up) 
May December
Past Lives
(I might move all these around, really)
Maestro

 But there's nothing terrible in this category!  That's always a plus. This will NOT be one of the times we feel like throwing something at the television on Oscars night. 

Tuesday, May 04, 2021

Do I even remember how to blog?

 I seriously don't know! 

But what I do know is that throughout the past decade I have offered up my thoughts, consistently, on the Book of Face, and where does that get me? Shares, likes, and peeks into the lives of people I haven't seen in years are all fun and algorithm games -- until suddenly it's not as fun anymore. It seems that fb is trying to steer us more into groups; why is that? Can anyone explain it to me from the monetary perspective?  Sure, I could quit all my fb groups and then fb would have to show me individual fbriends (amid the ads) but, thing is, I WANT the group info, just not at the cost of the people. Also, I am quite curious about things I can never know, like whether fewer people are seeing my posts since I started posting gender critical rants, which is my totally unconfirmed suspicion. And the flip side of that coin being how very many individuals who have swallowed the prevailing not-wisdom public discourse about various ideologies are less fun to interact with in the first place with their repeat-the-catechism politics. The trumptydumpty era was awful and consumed so much of my book of face even when I refused to type his name. I want us to make it better and fun again...but I don't know if that's likely to happen as big tech works toward its data-grabbing post-human singularity or whatever. 

On that note, I still am not a TV watcher  (and still not a binge-er) but Silicon Valley remains a thing that I love and that makes me laugh out loudest with both a sense of maddening absurdity and recognition. I have also got a season or two into The Good Place, whose philosophy I was assured I would very much love, and it's true! I do! I am more like Chidi than anyone I have ever met. And the ways I am not like Chidi? Are the ways I'm like Eleanor. I love that show. 

See, this is making me sad.  I wish I had spent the pandemic blogging instead of facebooking. 

Things I should have blogged about instead of posting to the book of face: 

1. My 100 Days of Nature Walks -- now with 10% more walking! (Because I ended up doing 110 days)  I spent last summer taking a walk outside every day in a different park/nature preserve/hike from my 60 Hikes Within 60 Miles - Chicago book/other outdoor nature walking locale. It was an amazing streak! 

2. Quarantine life -- WHICH I LOVE. And no, I did not make any sourdough or watch your stupid T*ger K*ng. I did not binge anything.  I did not get bored. I thoroughly enjoyed ceasing commuting, came to appreciate teaching online, and discovered the greatness of working remotely is working from various locations around the country. 

3. Black Lives Matter. Our nation's long overdue reckoning with white privilege matters. 

4. I reached my escape velocity from Chicago and flew South for the winter, where I am enjoying my #Atlantaresidency. Why am I not blogging about it? 

5. Recent film projects! 

At some point in quarantine summer, I finished watching all of the Best Picture Oscar Winners! One of my many-years-in-the-making off-and-on projects! I even talked about it on the O.C.C.: Oscar Category Completist podcast episode #35: all-Time Oscar Completist -- Best Picture with Linda Napikoski

Then, over the winter I finished up the AFI Top 100 original list of 100 Years...100 Movies that I have been slooowly sporadically working on since 1998. I had a lot of opinions about some of these flicks!  

And then, during this most recent awards season, I did not step foot in a movie theaters but I watched Every. Single. Oscar. Nominee. In my living room. What an interesting year! 

Why should only people who are on fb with me get to hear about these things? 😅

So, I say, let's remember how to blog. 

Of course I have questions. Among them : 

Who's still blogging? 

What blogs and web sites do you read regularly?  

What questions do you have? 



Saturday, May 12, 2018

Birthday Bloggage: Reflection Time!

Tomorrow, yikes!, is my birthday. I don't want to say I've been depressed, exactly, about this approaching birthday, but I have at least been nigh on discomfited, mostly along the lines of "why the !@#$%&* haven't I accomplished everything I wanted to have accomplished by now?!"

But that's never a really useful birthday-approaching thought process, now is it?

So I decided to give myself some good advice: "Accentuate the positive!" (so original, I know), and to take said good advice from myself, that is to say, to think about things that I DID do during the past year.

Some things I did while I was (*) years old:

  • Worked on the writing of three new books -- yes, I now have three books in active progress.
    Negative spin: I have so many works in progress and haven't finished any of them.
    Positive spin: I have put into action THREE new book ideas and made progress on all of them! 
  • Wrote a bunch of songs.
    Negative spin: What am I going to do with them? And they might all be terrible.
    Positive spin: Holy shite I've been writing songs! Like, lots of songs! I've discovered this whole new part of myself over the past nine months. It's incredible and I seriously don't know what to make of it, but I'm digging it. 
  • Traveled all around the Midwest and even some other parts of the U.S., with no small number of road trips during the last year, having driven to: Iowa (twice), Nebraska, Wisconsin (several times), Michigan, Indiana, and we mustn't forget St. Louis for the total solar eclipse which was AWESOME and, related to the point above, was the genesis of the first song I wrote, an eclipse metaphor about the universe/love/life that just kind of poured out of my brain while I was sitting on the highway in post-eclipse traffic trying to drive back to Chicago.
    Negative spin: I didn't get to go on the Habitat for Humanity trip to Prince Edward Island I'd been planning to attend. Positive spin: So f-ing what? I got to see family, friends, three weddings, and the super-cool eclipse event that was apparently the opening of a new chapter in my life. 
  • Lost weight - I finally shed all those back-in-the-U.S.A pounds.
    Negative spin: Don't really have one. Except that so many of my clothes are too unwearably big, ha! 
  • Took even more classes at the Old Town School of Folk Music aka my second home these days, adding to my regular weekly guitar class several more including guitar fingerboard theory, vocal techniques (twice), songwriting (see above!), and perhaps foremost in my joy the Modern Country Ensemble, which I enjoy so thoroughly that I am now taking it for a fifth session in a row. It is a joy and a treasure, and every sixteen weeks we perform a real live gig. My Monday nights at the Old Town School are such a given, and now Tuesdays too...
    Negative spin: I'm busy. Positive spin: I love it. 
  • Became a regular volunteer at the Old Town School of Folk Music, which enables me to afford everything I just mentioned in the previous point.
    Negative spin: Yup, really busy. Positive spin: I love it. 
  • Made new friends. Building community is hard enough when adults stay put, and I gallivant about the world so much that I may have had it even harder, plus I actually really need solitude and seriously carve out time each week to be alone, but whether it was the whole staying-in-one-place-for-three+-years thing, or the whole hanging-out-with-music-people and hanging-out-with-books-people and hanging-out-with-yoga-people things, I have definitely made actual new friends during the past year, which is interesting and nice. I mean, I'm disgusted with so much of humanity (negativity!) that it's rather nice if rare when I find humans I like (positivity, check it!) 
  • Finished my Prez Bio reading up through Dubya, which technically is the completion of my Prez Bios reading project, which you'll recall was launched during Dubya's administration and was called Reading a Biography of Every President In Order, To See Where We Went Wrong. Of course, since then we have gone even wronger, and I am going to also read books about Obama (after which point the presidency dies and my project dies with it so don't you even dare suggest...) but I did technically make it to the "end" of what I set out to do. Finally!
    Negative spin: What took me so long? Positive spin: I did that! 
  • Speaking of books, some of the great ones I read this past year: A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking, Under the Big Black Sun: A Personal History of L.A. Punk by John Doe et. al., Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process by John McPhee, Why Buddhism Is True: The Science and Philosophy of Enlightenment by Robert Wright, American Plays of the New Woman ed. by Keith Newlin, and La vida util de Pilo Polilla  by Vivian Mansour Manzur, along with a bunch of other good and some not-so-good ones, AND I recently led in my local store the book group discussion of The Female Persuasion by Meg Wolitzer, which was the inaugural selection of the Barnes & Noble nationwide book club. 
  • Found interesting English/ESL teaching work with some non-profits, mostly teaching immigrants, which led me to discover how much more enjoyable it is to teach these classes as opposed to the for-profit school for which I'd been working (and which I swear drove me to drink) the previous couple of years here in Chicago. That was interesting to learn.
    Negative spin: I seriously didn't want to go back to the classroom at all... Positive spin: Work. Work earns money. Work accomplishes things. Work it. 
  • Speaking of work, at all three of the part-time jobs that I had one year ago and still have, I have had my accomplishments recognized with different positions/training/new responsibilities kind of things. Negative spin: They weren't promotions to full-time massive-money-making career ops. Positive spin: Employers recognize that I am smart and do things.
And ya know, those are just a.) the easily listable things b.)that I'm willing to discuss on a public blog. I have also done other things on philosophical, personal, introspective, and psychological levels that either aren't as quantifiable or easy to notate or don't really need to be delineated here or whatever. But my point is - it was quite a year, now that I stop to think about it.

AND I saw Indigo Girls perform four times during it, plus Emily Saliers' solo show. So there. Not to mention dozens of other bands and singers, and totally I didn't mention how much new music I came to know about because of Spotify. I even succumbed to Spotify Premium this year. Consider me thoroughly Spotified. . 

AND I saw a bunch of good movies. 

AND I spent so much quality time with my kittens like you would not believe. 

AND I de-cluttered my closet and got rid of clothes I don't wear anymore and got rid of some other stuff around the house, too.

AND I continued to discover new restaurants and happy hours and hiking (walking) spots around Chicago and to look at the Lake on a regular basis. 

So although I did not in fact really conquer life, the universe, and everything in the ways I had planned to do... I did other things instead! 

Let's see what the next year brings. 

Monday, February 26, 2018

Twelve Days of Oscar, Day 5 Redux:
Adapted Screenplay and Original Screenplay

Well, I failed at delivering a Day 5 post on Day 5, so here we go, a dollar short, with a couple of my absolute favorite categories, the screenplays.

Adapted Screenplay:
Call Me By Your Name, James Ivory
The Disaster Artist, Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber
Logan, Scott Frank & James Mangold and Michael Green
Molly's Game, Aaron Sorkin
Mudbound, Virgil Williams and Dee Rees

Original Screenplay:
The Big Sick, Emily V. Gordon and Kumail Nanjiani
Get Out, Jordan Peele
Lady Bird, Greta Gerwig
The Shape of Water, Guillermo Del Toro, Vanessa Taylor
Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri, Martin McDonagh

Oh, I do love me some writers and writing. Let's think, shall we, about which of these writerly persons will take the stage on Oscars night for a moment of glory, and, it is hoped, a clever word or two in their brief allotted speech time (broadcast director: stop playing off the winners! folks at home: stop whining that the ceremony is too long! ain't no one forcing you to watch!)

Regrettably I have not read ANY of the source material for the adapted screenplay nominees, although I have touched the four real books and contemplated reading them (as opposed to the graphic novel, which, yes, I did just judge as "not a real book" in case you're wondering). It's fun to know the source material, but it's also kind of fun this way, being in the dark, and noting which movies make me want to go read the original book, which in this case is all of them (except Logan, because I don't ever want to read graphic novels, which is not I repeat NOT a content thing but just my inability to enjoy reading books of pictures. Give me prose or give me a drawing, but not both together. I physically cannot stand reading graphic novels and comic books. It makes me uncomfortable. Do not enjoy.)

People love to praise Aaron Sorkin and Diablo Cody and other screenwriters who fill actors' mouth with long, winding phrases of snappy discourse, which is fine with me because my own writing of dialogue is decidedly in that direction sometimes, so praise away, people! Although I personally think they go a little overboard about just how complex Sorkin's writing is at times, I thought the Molly's Game screenplay was quite good. There was quite a bit of back and forth between voiceover narration and on-screen action that was well handled. Mudbbound also had to decided when to weave in and out of voiceover, and I take it from how the film was done that the book, too, had multiple first person narrators? That story had a lot going on and everything was clear. (Clear as Mudbound! There's a fun new phrase for a screenwriting standard to aspire to. Don't say I never gave ya nothin'.) Having absolutely been down the path of The Room hate/lovewatching cult madness, I was eminently curious how The Disaster Artist would be, and I thought it was remarkable. Call Me By Your Name, as I've mentioned in previous posts, is one of my favorites of this year's nominees but so much of that is from the emotions of the book itself; in fact, in recent days I've read many articles about how faithful James Ivory was to the book, with, for example, Michael Stuhlbarg's stunning monologue being evidently lifted right from the novel. Which is great - I'm just not sure that means Ivory merits an Oscar, for leaving well enough alone? Always a tough call in this category. As for Logan, sorry y'all, and it's NOT because it was a comic book that I don't want it to win but for reasons of cliche and gee-didn't-see-that-coming-except-we-all-totally-did with which the screenplay was riddled.

I really think the two best efforts here were Mudbound and The Disaster Artist. And I think either one has a chance of winning, and, to complicate matters, they both have outside factors that might influence people to vote not just on the merits. James Franco was an early favorite as a sure-nomination-thing in the Lead Actor category for playing nutso Tommy Wiseau, the not-genius behind The Room, in The Disaster Artist, and there is much speculation that late revelations about his inappropriate sexist and awful behavior are what made the #TIMESUP Academy not nominate him. So, will people be more inclined to reward what they can from the film, the writing, here, since it's the only nomination it got? Or less inclined, because it's still associated with James Franco? As for Mudbound, Dee Rees' nomination is the first for a black woman for an adapted screenplay, and it's always fun to make history. So who knows where voters minds will go?

On to Originals... well, we all know by now that Greta Gerwig wrote Lady Bird and people's minds are blown by this. I have found Lady Bird to be great and overrated. Sometimes people misunderstand me and say we shouldn't call things "overrated" because one person loves something and another person doesn't and that's just differing opinions. True that -- but that's also not what "overrated" means. I'm not saying it "wasn't that good" - then I'd say adequate or mediocre or whatever. I'm saying the frenzied reaction to it is weirdly outsized and kind of off-kilter. That can be true of reaction to something fabulous, something terrible, or something in between. In the case of Lady Bird, I've been mystified by all the people including critics who get paid to watch hundreds of movies a year saying that they've never seen anything like it because, um, what the heck have they all been watching, I wonder? But it was good. I don't think Gerwig is going to win in the Directing category, but she might win here for Writing. It was well written. Speaking of directors realizing their vision and writing it too, we've got Guillermo del Toro and the (SO WEIRD!) The Shape of Water. As I have been saying, this (weird!) movie doesn't do it for me the way it does for many, but I recognize that del Toro is creative and realizes his visions and renders them as art for many to enjoy... this doesn't necessarily make me advocate for him to win the screenplay Oscar, though. He was nominated for writing another weird fable, Pan's Labyrinth, a decade or so ago, losing then to Michael Arndt for Little Miss Sunshine. I don't think writing was The Shape of Water's main strength, and don't want it to win this. (Do I think it had strengths? Weeelll..even though it was damn weird, honestly, the directing was all right. We'll talk about that tomorrow, maybe.)

Yet ANOTHER nominee who both wrote and directed this year, Martin McDonagh, is the current recipient of backlash right now for his Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri white privilege racism. It's hard to discuss without spoilering the movie, so I won't, but I will say that he leaves some things very much up for debate and in my interpretation does not come down on the side of ever saying this or that majorly flawed character is redeemed, despite indications that maybe he's holding out hope everyone is redeemable. I think some people just generally also have an issue with Irish Guy writing about small-town, racially divided USA, which is fair on one hand, but on another hand, Irish people have in our very lifetimes lived in a place of extremely divided violence and ethno-religous strife so it's not like he's all smiles and flowers and bunnies and roses and then trying to make some commentary from a place of utter b.s.  Man, I was SUCH a huge fan of his previous movie, In Bruges, which may be affecting my understanding of what he was trying to do here ("Save the next little boy!" <--one of my all-time favorite movie moments. just go watch In Bruges, please, thanks)

And then there are the movies that are definitely written funny. Now, I know there was some consternation about Get Out  being in the Musical/Comedy category at the Golden Globes because it is addressing pretty much the most serious topic but first of all, that's just a big misunderstanding of the Globes, where part of the fun is mocking their weird Drama and Musical/Comedy categories and predicting what will inappropriately be relegated to the latter, and secondly, seriously, though, Get Out was funny. While also being serious. But it was written funny. Like VEEP. Ya know? OK, maybe not exactly like VEEP. But serious while being funny. And Jordan Peele is another person whose previous film I liked very much indeed (yay, Keanu!) I also think Kumail Nanjiani is hilarious, and while I love everything about watching Silicon Valley, he is definitely one huge part of the hilarity of that show, and I relished watching him in The Big Sick, which he co-wrote with his wife Emily V. Gordon, with whom I was unfamiliar before this. It was really good! I blew it off when it came out in theaters, despite all the good things I heard about it, and just got around to watching it recently, after the nominations came out. I really, really liked it and stayed up to watch the whole thing even though I started it at 11:30 p.m., which in itself is some kind of testament to the writing.

And so, my picks? This is hard. Way too hard. Help.

Adapted Screenplay: I want The Disaster Artist or Mudbound to win. I think Call Me By Your Name might, though.
Original Screenplay: I guess I want The Big Sick or Lady Bird, and I think it's going to be either Lady Bird or Get Out.

I really wouldn't have a problem with most of the possible outcomes here. But it's so hard to pick. I want to reward all the writers! Shower the writers with prizes and accolades!

Which screenplays are you rooting for?

My Previous Days of Oscar:
Day 4: Supporting Actor and Lead Actress
Day 3: Production Design and Costume Design

Day 2: Editing and Original Score
Day 1: Sound Mixing and Sound Editing

Thursday, July 06, 2017

Terry Talks the Talk and Walks All the Walks

We need to talk about Terry Tempest Williams now. After you read my blog, run, don't walk, to your local bookstore and buy one of her books. Yes, you could "just go on Amazon" (shudder - does it have to be Amazon? Bookstores do have web sites, you know) but I'd like to think you might not
want to make this purchase from Amazon, if you think enough about all that Terry Tempest Williams is. So let's talk about her. Settle in. Get comfortable. But also? Get uncomfortable.

From http://www.coyoteclan.com/bio.html
Get uncomfortable, yes. Why do I say that? Because it will be to your benefit to get uncomfortable once in a while.

And it could possibly be to Earth's benefit as well. That's one of the points TTW made Wednesday night in her author appearance at Women and Children First bookstore, where she discussed  The Hour of Land: A Personal Topography of America's National Parks and the current state of the country, humanity, and the planet. She was talking about her recent semester as a visiting professor at Dartmouth and the toughest class she ever taught, she said, because of the way the people in the classroom challenged her. She described a classroom in which she was accused, sometimes rightfully, of not understanding young activists as much as she should or of needing to learn more about what it means to be queer, which she did, and in which people sometimes said things like, "All this talk of sexual assault is irrelevant to my life" or "My brown body does not matter in any of these books you have assigned." But, she said, instead of rupturing, they kept at it, and she learned from them, and they learned from each other. She said that she told them on the first day "This is not a safe space" and if they were looking for that they were in the wrong place. It was a supportive space - but not a safe space, because writing is not a safe space. (<--her words)

Also, our world is not a safe space right now. (<--my words)

But writing, among other courageous acts of resistance, may help us.


It would be hard for me to overstate the value of Terry Tempest Williams' words. Others agree with me. See, e.g., this bit of a book review from The New York Times. (right)

At the bookstore appearance, TTW talked about the land in Utah, her homeland, which she described as a formerly rich desert that has been mined so much it now looks like an exposed nervous system.

During the Q&A period, a young audience person from Florida asked how to cope when, in the young person's lifetime, the Everglades and Dry Tortugas National Park disappear underwater. "Don't look away," Terry said.

I think that's what we all do so damn much of, looking away. Because:
-It's uncomfortable.
-It's hard.
-I can't do anything about it.
-I just can't deal.

Click click click click click click ...

A frenzy of looking away. Our looking away takes many forms, and we can talk about some more of those in a minute.

Like many people, I first came to Terry Tempest Williams' writing with Refuge: An Unnatural History of Family and Place. It, and she, were big in the circles I ran in when I was 18, and I looked forward to reading it when it was assigned in my Women in Literature class taught by the inimitable Cecilia Konchar Farr during her last semester in Utah (that's another story for another time). I was in the small group that did our semester project on Refuge, and that project became a pilgrimage to the Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge, a class presentation done in the style of a church program (you'll understand why when you read the book), and then a protest demonstration. Cecilia dubbed us the "Refuge Radicals." You can see how all this is maybe a formative part of me, or perhaps an early recognition of all that I am.

But it's not about me--Refuge has spoken to so many people, with its tale of family, cancer, Earth, birds, cycles, destruction, and how we can go on. Terry Tempest Williams talked in this bookstore appearance about her Chinese translator of Refuge. TTW just recently got back from China. ("Beijing air," she said when she interrupted her reading for a small bout of coughing. "Also Salt Lake City air," she added.) The Chinese woman had commented that Terry's work was becoming more political and needed more beauty. Terry countered that that translator's work could maybe use more politics and less emphasis on beauty. They laughed. They are friends. They are each doing what they can, courageously.

We can be both compassionate and harsh. AT THE SAME TIME. I thrilled to hear TTW say that. I know that, and I know what it is to be put in a box, to be told if I'm one I'm not the other. Now, she clearly has a demeanor that would never be mistaken for mine; I'm sure you'll find her gentler, but don't you go thinking that she is not fierce. She fights, and with her life's work as a writer and naturalist she has fought and fought and fought for this land we are trampling, we the human race.

What are we racing toward?

Whatever it is, I don't think you need to worry about people's feelings getting hurt when I say things to them about the destruction on the path. To know me is to know that of all the possible motives for words and actions, wanton malice isn't mine. Maybe when someone says something "intense" we can benefit from hearing them instead of wishing they would speak the way we would have them speak.

"Smile." "Be sweet." Nah. Let's get uncomfortable. As TTW reminded us, we need to have the courage. Writing. Listening. Saying "That's bullshit."  Saying "Thank you, I understand you now. I've heard you."  ALL of these are necessary if we're going to have any hope whatsoever of saving our planet from human-wrought death and destruction. (Humanity itself, it has to be said, may not be worth saving.)

I know, I know, you think humanity is special, unique, privileged, chosen, blessed.  If you had heard Terry Tempest Williams talk about the bison she recently saw in Yellowstone, I think you might have shed tears along with me. I don't feel entitled to retell her story -- I hope you can hear it from her someday -- but I will tell you that in it, bison were grieving the loss of one of their own, and TTW reminded us that we are not the only species living, breathing, and grieving here with loved ones. My own deepest wish in this world is that you, each of you, each of us, will join in opening the cages and letting each being live the wild life it was meant to live. You might not be ready to listen to the trees and hear their message, as TTW did; you might not be ready to know how much the land matters, more than you are prepared to admit (she can help you, though). But I expect you to try to do better. And to not look away.

It's uncomfortable. It's hard. I can't do anything about it. I just can't deal.

It's uncomfortable to think about how much animals suffer because we, unlike the wolf Terry Tempest Williams observed in Yellowstone, don't go in for a quick kill with our jaws at the throat. We have a slow, laborious, monstrous industrialized meat process, from factory farm to slaughterhouse line where they are herded and trapped on conveyor belts, watching their fellows be killed in front of them, held tight with no escape possible, because we don't care how many billions of people there are -- we demand large animal livestock meat for all of them. It is one of the most environmentally irresponsible things we do in addition to being cruel. Do you think about this when you plan your meat menus? Or is it too "hard" to eat meat just once a week?  "Don't look away," Terry Tempest Williams said.

It's hard to live without:
-bacon
-driving
-electricity
-hot water
So we live a life of fossil fuel consumption. But we can think about it.  How else are you going to get better? Don't look away.

People tell me they love rabbits. Their child loves rabbits. And so what do they do? Get a "pet" rabbit, and lock it in a cage. Alone. A rabbit, for merciful god's sake, alone with no other companion of its species, locked in a cage.  How DARE anyone cage an animal as a pet? Where does such almighty hubris come from?

I expect better of you. I expect you to not look away when your friend/neighbor/associate puts a sentient being in a cage, or declaws a cat to "save" their precious furniture. It's furniture. An object you purchased, and you think it's better than a life. A living body. I expect so much better of humans, and I am so disappointed.

You can't do anything about it? Well, you can not look away when sentient beings suffer so that you can have:
-medicine
-a Coach bag
-iPhones
-milk

You just can't deal. But you sure can upgrade your smartphone! The planned obsolescence of technology rapes the earth. That's a fact. Don't look away from it.

Milk. Ye.Gods. Milk, seriously, is one of the most grotesque things humanity does. No other species suckles at the breast of a different animal unless it's a unique, life-threatening emergency. Humans, though? We've got an entire industry, a multi-million dollar industry, with one of THE most powerful lobbies known to man (and they are, largely, men with that power), that has you 100% convinced you need milk for nutrition (you don't), that if you've "got milk" you're all set (for being overweight and higher cancer risk, maybe), that milk does a body good (whose body? not yours, not the raped mother cow nor the calf taken away from her who was entitled to the milk her body produced, not the imprisoned body kept captive and not moving while it is milked, day in and day out, like a machine, by a machine, for years, just for your cereal and your latte in which you could replace the dairy product with soy milk, almond milk, oat milk, hemp milk, rice milk, cashew milk...)   DON'T look away! Don't! Look at this. Look at your part in it. Look at what it says about our (lack of) respect for the animals and the land.

Terry Tempest Williams didn't say anything about milk in the bookstore. I'm just demonstrating that we are participating in the destruction of our planet, on both micro and macro scales, daily, because of our sheer disregard for the lives all around us - of trees, grassland, cows, wolves, national parks...you name it.

With tears in her eyes, she answered the question about how to cope with the loss of our planet's land by saying, "I don't know. But don't look away."

This is my testimony. I'm not telling you to never consume an animal product. I know that life is suffering. I KNOW this is true. And I've read Ishmael by Daniel Quinn. Have you? I understand what it means to be a species on this planet. I don't think humanity quite does. The other species seem to understand that they aren't the only goddamned species. (And if god had any sense, he would damn us, I believe, humans being the rotten lot we are.) (I mean like if he existed and stuff.)

I am telling you you should read TTW's book about our national parks and think about what it means that we have an occupying U.S. administration actively dismantling any protections our public lands have.

You will now be able to go hunt grizzly bears. That's apparently how we "make America great again." It's an absolute horror show.

TTW praised Aldo Leopold and the Leopold family, who have tracked the changes for years and demonstrated that the climate is changing and altering the landscape. Aldo Leopold's A Sand County Almanac (so Midwestern!) is another book I read as an English major, as I was entering the world of Terry Tempest Williams, Edward Abbey, Wendell Berry, and all the Western naturalists who made me understand how much I loved my Arizona, Southwest, and West homelands, who made me see how much the "empty" lands and open spaces can teach us. All these writers have been warning us about the ways we're changing the climate, the landscape, the planet. For years. Listen. Let's not look away.

Terry Tempest Williams and I come from some of the same places, both geographical and religious. We have both grappled and questioned, each in our own ways. One thing our upbringing taught us, though, is the power of bearing testimony. It's remarkable, really, that a religion most people see as "cult-like" (it's not, and we'll have that discussion another day, too) actually hands over the bulk of the church meeting, once a month, to whoever wants to come up to the open microphone. Well, this Earth we're on needs a giant testimony meeting right now. Don't tell people to be quiet and "avoid politics." Don't look away. Don't tell people they're "not being nice." Don't worry about offending someone when you call them out on their behavior. Don't think of it as inappropriate to remind someone that by their lifestyle they're encouraging sweatshops, imprisonment, torture, hideous slaughter, trafficking, death, endangered species, and the flooding of our planet (Noah's ark, anyone?) I can't think of anything MORE appropriate than issuing the warning, loud and clear, from every bully pulpit - social media, face-to-face, or whatever else you can get your hands and vocal chords on.

This is my testimony, and I say it in the name of all that is good and holy in this universe: we've got to think about the land. We've got to think about Earth. We've got to think about the other species on it. Humanity might be doomed, or you might have a slight, tiny, glimmer of a chance. It would help you if you start listening to and understanding the likes of Terry Tempest Williams.

Sunday, December 18, 2016

One More Day Before the Storm

As Macbeth said, "Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow..."  

But I do believe that tomorrow, Monday, December 19th, will in fact signify something.
The future, which occurs after the present

I've had this super-weird confluence of personal, professional, and political timing, which all seem to be coming to a frothy head tomorrow. So, when I woke up today (Sunday, December 18th) and Facebook was offering up Fb memories of our three-years-ago trip to Hong Kong Disney, I decided this image of me at Tomorrowland says something important.

Tomorrow means hope. It's not all gloom and doom creeping in at a petty pace, Macbeth. Now, Macbeth is my boy (i.e. favorite Shakespeare tragedy) and he certainly has it right that there are fools and poor players all around us strutting and fretting (ahem TheDnldWTFTrumpface ahem). But the very notion of tomorrow brings hope, as one of my OTHER favorite plays of all time reminds us. So, so, so much hope for the wretches whom Macbeth might call "walking shadows" as they contemplate revolution in Les Misérables:

"There's a new world for the winning/Do you hear the people sing?"

When the Electoral College meets tomorrow, will they hear? Will they do the right thing, the moral thing, the Constitutional thing, and use their best judgment to cast their votes, which means casting them so that TheDnldWTFTrumpface does not ascend to the presidency?

While that's happening politically, I also personally have a huge and emotional development tomorrow in my professional life. (No, the electors aren't going to elect me...that I know of!) One era is coming to an end, due in large part to reduction-in-force layoffs that came slamming into one of my gigs, but not entirely due to that, as I have seized upon a blessing-in-disguise opportunity to do some stuff when this particular new little era of mine dawns. AND, just to compound the personal/professional/tomorrow timing of it all, the last month and a half has been a whirlwind, a mighty and fierce whirlwind, of me working two and a half jobs, laying groundwork, and figuring out lots of big stuff, and all this has been happening since Monday, November 7, the first "One Day More," which led us to the horrible Tuesday, November 8 election day or more accurately the horrible Wednesday, November 9 Day After. So for one month and a half I have been in this intense stirring up of life and time (working every day, sometimes two jobs, plus other events, with no time to think but just go go go with eyes on the prize), with big developments, and meanwhile this parallel thing happening of Trumpface and the end of the world and the burgeoning fight for the #ElectoralCollegeExMachina moment we all need and then after a particularly intense last burst of the 36 hours from 11 a.m. Friday through 11 p.m. Saturday where I was just everywhere serving three or more masters and just go go go went went went I came home and rested.

Sleeping deeply.

And waking up today to Facebook memories of Tomorrowland and the imminence of tomorrow, December 19, when one big thing ends in my personal life, AND there is one superbig chance for the whole world in political life.

Sing it, Les Misérables:

"Tomorrow is the judgment day
Tomorrow we'll discover what our god in heaven has in store
One more dawn
One more day
One day more."


Tuesday, March 01, 2016

Breaking Point

Yesterday, I was on a little errand at the airport that led to me standing in a waiting area for a few minutes, subjected to CNN. I'd nearly forgotten what watching CNN is like. We don't get that channel in our house, and I apparently became spoiled by those several blissful years abroad watching CNN International, which isn't anywhere near as inane or sensationalist. Anyway, there I was, and Wolf Blitzer alerted me to some "breaking news": that in their latest poll, Donald Trump led by more points than ever, and soon he would be holding a rally, for which CNN was "standing by."

Breaking news?  As the kids say, Wolf, I don't think those words mean what you think they mean.

Breaking news refers to an ongoing situation, a story that is developing even as it is being covered. It is not -- I repeat, NOT -- a synonym for "a new story." They are not the same thing. That's what we have the word "news" for. Adding "breaking" is adding another element. Journalists are not reporting "breaking news" when they report "something exciting." The results of a poll, any poll, are in no way on this or any other planet "breaking news." They are in fact the very opposite: poll results are planned, anticipated, and in fact in the case of this CNN-conducted poll, manufactured by the very entity that then "reports" on it. Neither, by the way, is a campaign rally that is about to start breaking news.

Essentially, this ridiculous use of the term made me want to throw things at the TV. Instead, I'm going to throw some actual examples of breaking news out there to help people understand the difference. (Are you reading this, CNN producers??) Let's take a look at some of the recent winners of the Pulitzer Prize in the Breaking News category:

Most recently, the staff of The Seattle Times won the Breaking News Reporting Pulitzer for, and I'm quoting the official Pulitzer web site here, "its digital account of a landslide that killed 43 people and the impressive follow-up reporting that explored whether the calamity could have been avoided."

Contrast that with the most recent winners in other categories, such as Explanatory Reporting (Bloomberg News' Zachary Mider's "clear and entertaining" explanations of how corporations dodge taxes) and Investigative Reporting (shared by The New York Times' Eric Lipton on how lobbyists sway legislators and attorneys general and The Wall Street Journal for their "Medicare Unmasked" project). 


Previous Breaking News Reporting winners include: 

  • The Boston Globe, for its "exhaustive and empathetic coverage of the Boston Marathon bombing"
  • The Denver Post for coverage of the Aurora, Colorado movie theater shooting, "using journalistic tools, from Twitter and Facebook to video and written reports, both to capture a breaking story and provide context"
  • The Tuscaloosa News,  for "enterprising coverage of a deadly tornado" even when power interruptions forced them to publish at a plant 50 miles away
  • The Washington Post, for "telling the developing story" of the Virginia Tech shooting in print and online
  • The Times-Picayune of New Orleans for Hurricane Katrina coverage, "overcoming desperate conditions facing the city and the newspaper"
Does this help, CNN, et.al.? Do you see what happens in breaking news coverage?  

If not, could you maybe try reading a few more newspapers until you figure it out?

Come on, even the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is excited about journalism these days, having bestowed the Best Picture Oscar on Spotlight the other day. Journalism is great! Get your vocabulary right, everybody.

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Shala (la la la lala lala)
A few glorious days in Phuket

We're back!

That is to say, Brian and I have returned to Phuket, Thailand, the scene of our January 2012 post-teaching-in-Korea straight-outta-Guangzhou CELTA-course month long stint for yet another post-teaching-in-Asia straight-outta-Guangzhou (this time having lived there, not just visited) personal improvement month long stint. Because if something works, you should totally do it again two years later; isn't that what they say?

And is Phuket just as we left it?  Are all our favorite restaurants still open? Is the Thai iced coffee as delightsome? Do the birds sing, the pool waters glisten, the smells of curry entice, and the rays of sunshine warm both our faces and our hearts?  No, no, but yes and YES!

We hatched the you-can-go-back-to-Phuket-again plan a few months ago and we have made it happen. I just sat there one day during the Guangzhou rainy season (which lasts about eight months) and thought: when we leave this place, we should totally live in Phuket for a month again. I'm really happy that Brian was on board with this plan, because I pretty much would have done it anyway...but of course he was! Because this place is magical and lovely and perfect and nothing could make it better except maybe if we could have brought Quincy with us...but that's another story.

So far, I have successfully plunged into my swimming/writing/eating/reading/coffee/relaxing/strolling the streets of Old Town regimen, Brian has acquired a bicycle monthly rental for what I believe is properly referred to as his "bike-the-!@#*-out-of-this-island" conquest, and I have even found a pretty nice yoga place. It's down the road a piece, toward Chalong, near the zoo (gross), so it is a bit of an adventure to get there, or rather, to get back after the songthaews have stopped running (hello, bargaining for a moto taxi ride! thanks for the spare helmet!), but it was in such a pleasant location!  Up some wooden steps to an open air shala. What a lovely setting for an hour-and-a-half yoga session, although maybe doing it at dusk is not such a great idea for the mosquito-prone, such as me. Don't feel bad if you don't know what a shala is, because I didn't either, really, before today. You can tell that my ten+ years (I'm so OLD!) of yoga practice have been in gyms and on my own, eh? Because: huh. Shala. What do you know?

I could sit on the terrace gazing at the palm treetops, the clock tower, and the shimmering swimming pool forever, but I must interrupt that a few times a week to go to the beach, of course.

Phuket. Yes, please.



Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Giddy-up! A big fat welcome
to 2014 and the year of the horse

Let's have a recap of 2013, shall we?

I'm aware that 2013 could rightfully be summed up as "the year my blog withered and nearly died, or maybe kind of actually did die, but with potential of being resurrected" but that's not very specific, now is it?? Also, this is sort of a combination recap of the past calendar year (2013), the past year of the snake (which lasts another week yet before turning into the year of the horse), and the past year of working as a foreign trainer at Wall Street English in Guangzhou (Jan 14, 2013 - Jan 13, 2014).


1. What did you do in 2013 that you’d never done before?Besides "live in China," which is so obvious? I actually learned to speak a teeny, tiny bit of (Mandarin) Chinese, which was both terribly exciting, as it is something I have sworn for 30 years I was going to do, and terribly disappointing, in that I really can still not make it through a conversation beyond, say, "Me want beer. Give one. Thank you. Turn right."
2. Did you keep your new year's resolutions, and will you make more for next year?Hmmm, what did I resolve for 2013? If I resolved to blog regularly, I certainly failed miserably at that. Of course, pre-VPN that wasn't entirely my fault, but who are we kidding: I failed. But I can't remember what else I resolved. To learn Chinese? (see #1) Am I going to make more resolutions? Is the Pope a (surprisingly fun and socially just) Catholic? I've already made them. And I totally wrote them down this time. 
3. Did anyone close to you give birth?My sister! I now have a fifth nephiece. I totally and irrevocably have a free pass on the provide-me-a-grandchild front. We are good to go in that department. 
4. Did anyone close to you die?
Brian's grandfather and my sister's mother-in-law passed away, so I was really close to people who had people close to them die. And this is the second time someone close to Brian has died while we were living in Asia, which is kind of strange. 
5. Did you visit anywhere exciting?
We added five countries to our tally: the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. I was pretty delighted about traveling to Hanoi and Bali, among other places. And within China, we had Hong Kong and Macau right down the street railroad, so we went to each place multiple times. Plus, we squeezed in trips to Guilin-Yangshuo and Shanghai. So, yes to this one.
6. What would you like to have in 2014 that you lacked in 2013?As ever, and as the beloved Ms. Woolf put it, "a room of one's own." 
7. What date from 2013 will remain etched upon your memory, and why?
Probably January 8, the day we left the U.S. to move to China for the year. It was a great Manhattan Beach happy hour layover farewell.  
8. What was your biggest achievement of the year?
Huh. I'm really not sure. I'll go with working for a magazine as an assistant editor and writer. I'm all kinds of excited that I've been able to do that. 
9. What was your biggest mistake?
I think not switching from the Wednesday to the Tuesday Chinese class sooner--it's just a schedule thing, but I would have checked off a lot more of my Guangzhou list if I had done that, plus I would have had more happiness and sanity. 
10. Did you suffer illness or injury?
A little virus here and there. Managed to avoid the H7N9 and whatever other global pandemic is originating in China next...knock on wood.  
11. What was the best thing you bought?
New-to-me used laptop! Because I really needed one, you see. 
12. Whose behavior merited celebration?Quincy, our beloved adopted kitten, who is so charming and was such a good-hearted kitten that we were devastated to have to send him to live in Foshan with our friends, we but did that so he could live with a feline friend, and we think he appreciates it. And we are still involved in Quincy's life. 
13. Whose behavior made you appalled and depressed?
A few co-workers, specifically the ones who have lied to the company and/or looked the other way about bogus credentials, timekeeping/punching in and out, or calling in "sick"/hungover, and the two (TWO!) managers of mine who got fired for cooking the books and fudging numbers and cheating on targets instead of doing everything right. Please, people: behave in the workplace. Be adults. It's not that hard.

14. Where did most of your money go in 2013?
This is so easily plane tickets. To, from, and within China and SE Asia.  
15. What did you get really, really, really excited about?Plane tickets, to, from, and within China and SE Asia. 
16. What song will always remind you of 2013?
I suppose the Mileys: "We Can't Stop" and "Wrecking Ball."  Because Miley.
Um, God, hellllllooooooo!
17. Compared to this time last year, you are:
Fatter. I lost weight in Mexico and gained weight in China. Take that, all you foolish bean-and-cheese-and-tortilla-hatin' folk. Mexican food is delicious and fresh and perfect. 

18. What do you wish you’d done more of?
Writing. 
19. What do you wish you’d done less of?Drinking.
20. How did you spend Christmas?
In Macau! So fabulous. We loved Macau from the first minute we visited in early April, and knew we'd go back. And it was the perfect place to have a Christmas holiday; we splurged (as a Christmas present to ourselves) on a nice hotel and enjoyed a Christmas dinner feast, ice skating at the Venetian casino, wintry decorations, and so forth. 
21. Did you fall in love in 2013?
With Quincy!
22. What was your favorite TV program?
Although this was the year that Brian and I  hopped aboard the Game of Thrones bandwagon and I finally plunged into The Wire, the winner is, as it has been for the past five years, Breaking Bad
23. Do you hate anyone now that you didn’t hate this time last year?
Hmmm...hate being such a strong word...but I certainly hate the actions of several people that I didn't know about at this time last year. 
24. What was the best book you read?
The Grapes of Wrath
25. What was your greatest musical discovery?
Caitlin Rose (thanks, Ann!)
Plus, I actually listened to the lyrics of "Ho Hey"--he's singing about the Chinatown bus!! I never realized!
26. What did you want and get?
Trips to the Philippines and Vietnam. 
27. What did you want and not get?
To pay off one of my credit cards. I sort of had a plan for that, but then I failed. 
28. What did you do on your birthday, and how old were you?
Oh my, this birthday is best forgotten, truly. I was going without beer during the month of May, which meant that at the work-sponsored karaoke night on May 12 (the night before my day), I drank wine instead. One should not drink wine during an event of such unabashed drunken revelry, when one's glass is constantly refilled. One could kill oneself, or at least eat away the inside of one's esophagus, methinks. One should never have such copious amounts of wine. One wonders how Plato, Dionysus, et.al. did it? Needless to say, I was hungover (gross) on my birthday, and spent much of it lying on the floor of our apartment. Brian, who was suffering an unrelated ailment, went out to get me crackers after I pleaded with him to do so.  (Such a kind boyfriend. Happy birthday, eh?) I had to go to work to teach three classes from 6:00-9:30 p.m.  I made it, after a hangover meal at KFC. Argh. They had a nice cake for me at work, though!
29. What’s one thing that would have made your year immeasurably more satisfying?
In a schadenfreude way, I suppose that Peter, a manager who got fired for doing things we all knew he  wasn't supposed to do, some of which I refused to do, could have been fired in front of me instead of just being disappeared, and perhaps forced to retract his negative assessment of me as a non-team player who is "below average" on willingness to take on extra work, like the extra things he wasn't supposed to be pressuring us to do. 

Or, being able to take Quincy home to the U.S. 

Or, finishing more  books. Like, I really meant to also read Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Journey to the West, and The Water Margin while living in China, not just A Dream of Red Mansions/Chamber, which p.s. took me for freaking ever. 
30. How would you describe your personal fashion concept in 2013?
I wore skirts, button-down shirts, dresses, blouses, and sweaters to work. I wore the same three or four shirts and jeans on my days off. That's about it. 

31. What kept you sane?
Contenders: Goodreads. The DVD man on the corner. The VPN. Trivia night at the Tavern.
Maybe nothing, actually. 
32. Which celebrity/public figure did you fancy the most?
Um - no-one?  But I did get a not-so-little thrill every time Frank played a Jon Stewart clip from The Daily Show at trivia night, rather than the "funny" laugh-at-people-falling-flailing-failing /animal antics/weird signs/dirty innuendo videos.
33. What political issue stirred you the most?
Atrocious treatment of animals, to wit: cages (including in pet shops---tiny cages for cats -- no no no), the cat-and-dog-meat industries in China, with all their shady-side-of-the-law torture, underfeeding, inhumane treatment, housing, and transport, let alone slaughter, etc. 
34. Who do you miss the most?
??
I'm not sure that I really miss people, just in general. Is that bad? I definitely can't single one out.   
35. Who was the best new person you met?
Also ??  I mean, I don't have, like, a ranked order or something. 
36. Tell us a valuable life lesson you learned in 2013?
English is a skill for my students, and I am their trainer, facilitating their practice of that skill, just as a coach would help student to do a back handspring or hit down-and-away pitches. It's very helpful to conceive of language classes that way instead of as a "teacher" of information. 
37. What are your new year's resolutions for 2014?
Some of them are secret, but one of them is to work on having better posture. That one I can share.
Also, this lapsed vegetarian is gradually rediscovering her faith.