Showing posts with label Corporate Nonsense. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Corporate Nonsense. Show all posts

Thursday, February 05, 2026

Completed Category: Lead Actress, featuring 5 women

Quick reminder that I am #TeamBugonia and I would love for that film to be rewarded in spades but let's get real about the Best Actress  situation, shall we? 

Actress In A Leading Role
Jessie Buckley - Hamnet
Rose Byrne- If I Had Legs I'd Kick You
Kate Hudson - Song Sung Blue
Renata Reinsve - Sentimental Value
Emma Stone - Bugonia 

First, I would like to congratulate the Academy for nominating five women in this category. Please keep doing that!

Second, the reality of this situation is that Jessie Buckley is heavily, heavily, heavily favored to win this.  And I'm not really mad at that, other than it being no fun to have foregone conclusions or even frontrunners; we want suspense!  I liked Hamnet, it was lovely and faithful to the book, her character is earthy and witchy, and also I think Jessie Buckley could maybe play me in the movie of my life.  The only thing I'm bummed about is we have had to endure all of Yorgos Lanthimos' weirdo films, including his multiple collaborations with Emma Stone, including the psychotic Poor Things for which she won her second Oscar for goodness' sake (should have been Annette Bening in Nyad that year!!!)  and I was so very sick of their madness and then Bugonia  this year was so wonderful. Based on everything the two of them have put me through, my expectations couldn't have been lower, so I was pleasantly shocked at how fantastic it was. The best thing Yorgos and Emma have done to us by far, and THIS is the year that she has no real chance? Sigh. 

Well but them's the breaks. You know who else likely has no chance and whose performance I greatly enjoyed? Kate Hudson in Song Sung Blue. To be clear, that movie was a mess, with both screenplay and tone swinging wildly all over the place and hitting very little, but I could watch Kate singing Neil Diamond songs with Hugh Jackman for another two hours or two days or two months maybe.  Absolute Kate Hudson performance charm doing its thing, with some surprise serious moments to really act some different emotional stuff. (Because the movie is all over the place, as mentioned.) 

I could be the tiniest bit worried that Renata Reinsve could pull some votes because people have lost their minds about Sentimental Value. This is another film that I liked, after gingerly approaching it with trepidation due to the previous off-putting collaboration from that actress and director.  It's no Bugonia, but I really liked it. But it's as if people had decided they were going to nominate her before they even watched it. And nine nominations for the film? Nine?!  We kinda need to calm down about Sentimental Value.  

And then there is Rose Byrne.  She won the Golden Globe for Actress-Musical or Comedy (Jessie Buckley won Actress-Drama of course) and some people are whispering that she maybe upsets and wins the Oscar for the lunatic shitshow that is If I Had Legs I'd Kick You. And there is nothing I want less for this movie than an Oscar, except for how much I want my life to be nothing like anyone's in this movie at any point ever.  I do have legs, and if I could kick a film with them, I would kick this one. It is an excruciating journey through several people's terrible behavior, terrible choices, and terrible reactions to other people's behavior and choices.  You know how I've praised Hamnet for having three kids in big roles and none of them even slightly annoying? Yeah, If/Legs/Kick is the exact opposite of that.  The child is a total nightmare in every way from first scene to last.  I am on the hamster's side and everything about this flick can go away. Rose Byrne was definitely fierce and committed and whatnot but my goddesses can we please just not. 

And so. 

Order I want them to win: 

Emma Stone, Jessie Buckley or Kate Hudson, then a big gap, Renata Reinsve, then an even bigger gap, then Rose Byrne please no no no no although at least she is a woman but still just no 

Order I think they will win: 

Jessie Buckley

Then maybe if there's like voter fraud or we ban Shakespeare or some other crazy thing, maaaaaaybe people will make psychotic choices for Rose Byrne, or get nostalgic about their years of loving Kate Hudson and her family, or feel proud of themselves for watching Renata Reinsve in films with subtitles, or remember how much they like Emma Stone even though they gave her Oscars for all the wrong movies.  

But probably it'll be Jessie. 

Sunday, January 25, 2026

Who Wore It Better? Mid-Life Crisis Edition

Checking in quickly for an early, special edition of Who Wore It Best?

This year, George Clooney, Julia Roberts, and Brad Pitt, those high wattage movie star besties so dear to my Gen X heart, all starred in awards-conversation films featuring a full-fledged middle-age-turning-to-later-years What Is My Life's Work? crisis, with a bonus shared plot point of Who Does This Young Whippersnapper Think S/He Is? 

And I loved all of them. 


Only F1 has ended up with Oscar nominations, so Brad is going to have to carry this particular torch through the home stretch ("Wait for the straightaway!") but the Golden Globes did acknowledge George and Julia too. 

Jay Kelly - Hollywood, fake friends, Europe, awards, acting, sincerity, trains, career-spanning montage 

After the Hunt - academia, fake friends, pontificating, marriage, relationships, advisors, group think, ivory tower, identity, was-s/he-just-using-me? 

F1 - racing, real friends, fake fans, managers, family, co-workers, team building, car building, media, corporate sponsors, mavericks, mistakes, Europe, Las Vegas, Abu Dhabi, casino, podium finish, lessons learned 

Who Wore It Best?  

I LOVE THEM ALL 

#swan 


Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Left Without Our Own Devices

So the coolest thing happened today. My phone died for a little while. 

I do not mean that like, "Oh my phone died better grab a charger and plug it in whoops!"  In fact it was plugged in and it was  supposedly charging and I was driving down the highway singing along to my Spotify playlist of choice (R.E.M. "Man on the Moon" was the tune) and suddenly nothing. 

First I kept driving with one hand while with the other I reached for the charger and tried re-plugging it into the phone to coax it to revitalize itself and whatnot and the screen was like, nope, no devices are connected, wouldn't you like to connect one?! and then I picked up the phone and it was so dead even though it had been plugged in for the last hour or so as I was driving around rurally rural Minnesconsin. 

You know, Minnesconsin? I was in that very very northwestern part of Wisconsin right up against the state line where the trees and the landscape and the vibes and the mosquitoes all feel a bit more like Minnesota. And you get Minnesota stations on the radio, which I find sort of vaguely freaky, being east of the Mississippi but having the Man on the Radio be all "K-letter-letter-letter" which I really never thought about that much before today.  Anyway, I've been hanging out in Ashland and Bayfield enjoying the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore and my favorite lake, Lake Superior (it's the most Superior of all the lakes) for a few days and today I checked out the tallest waterfall in Wisconsin, Big Manitou Falls, and then I was headed to get an iced coffee and start wending my way back down into Wisconsin-Wisconsin and the closest iced coffee to be had in a southerly direction was a Caribou Coffee in Hinckley, Minnesota and I was almost there when my phone died. 

One thing about me is that I have to basically be dragged kicking and screaming to get a new phone. My phone works and it has my things and why do I need a new one? has sort of been my take for the last two or three decades. But, every 3 years or so the planned obsolescence demands that I get a new one and we are at a solid 3.25 years on the current device and so I really feared that I was just really truly phone less. In rurally rural Minnesconsin. And without having yet confirmed my lodging destination for tonight.  

Do you realize how much we rely on our phones? 
I mean, I know you think you do.  We all chuckle about it nonchalantly all the time. Ha ha ha we are all so addicted to our phones ha ha ha.  But most of you flick on the GPS to drive to a freaking restaurant. You don't even have a little mini-spiral-bound Rand McNally atlas in your backpack (as I do). 

OK but let's focus on what was viscerally important: I was arriving in Hinckley, Minnesota, population 1800-ish, and I knew I had another hour before the closing time of the coffee, according to what my still-alive phone had told me an hour or so earlier in the state park, and I figured I could go in to the coffee shop, plug in my phone to the wall and see if that was any better than the car charging (that was not charging), and or get out my laptop to connect to worldly things. 

My phone always has issues with Android Auto. But because I don't own my own car right now (urban walkable lifestyle for the win!) I only remember this when I have a rental car, like this week. It does occur to me, occasionally at least, that updating my phone more often might alleviate this. Maybe if I had my own car I'd care. But it's always disconnecting and re-connecting, which is why it had taken me a second to grasp how really dead it was in the first place. Side if not obvious note that the oldness of my phone and charger also concerned me and so as I drove around this tiny town of Hinckley NOT in fact spotting the Caribou Coffee but spotting the True Value Hardware store, I thought, let me get a new charger and maybe solve some of this problem. 

The man in the hardware store dutifully led me to his Android phone chargers, lamented with me how dependent we are on phones now, and described to me how to get to the Caribou Coffee: it's IN Tobie's Restaurant at the gas station.  Ah. It's not a real Caribou Coffee. I mean, it has all the drinks and the espresso and such, so I got my iced latte, but what it doesn't have is anywhere to sit or plug in. 

So, back in the car with the iced latte I try connecting the phone with the new charger and it is just not having it. It seems to recognize, with a little lightning bolt, but then nothing, No 1%, nothing. It was time for desperate moves. I drove on down the road to the McDonald's parking lot, sat there in a parking spot, pulled out my laptop, used the new charger to plug THAT in and give it a little power, made a hotel reservation a couple hours down the highway, and thought about how many road trips I went on in my late teens and early twenties with nary a smartphone in sight.  

What is wrong with us? Seriously? Why can't we make plans anymore? 

But beyond that, why must I use the phone for every thing? 

Because now it's later and I'm in a hotel room and my phone has charged after being plugged into an outlet (it was simply NOT having the car connection, clearly) and I really do need to get a new phone but this one might just get me through a few more days as I head home and all, but I'm sitting here typing on my laptop with my phone purposefully across the room from me. And I started thinking about how very many web sites demand two-factor authentication.  Both work-related and personal. I am forever entering the codes sent to my phone. What if I needed one of those earlier?  What is this brave new world we have created where every other moment of our existence sends us scurrying to this stupid device that is tracking everything we do (and say!) and selling all the data to billionaires galore?  How many hours could I last without using my phone, before some company demanded I access it in order to log in to their site? Let alone how work demands its use (without offering anyone company cell phones - I mean just to log in to fckng Microsoft or Salesforce or whatever). 

For me, text messaging is the biggest thing I miss if I don't have my phone or it's charging in another room; it's what I check most often throughout the day. So I mean, that's a decent reason to use a device frequently  - in contact with actual human beings one actually knows. 

But it really annoys me that banking and credit cards and email programs and work profiles and Outlook and several other daily task things send me to my phone before I can use them on a laptop.

I really really want to do some kind of a 72-hours-without-phone challenge.  I seriously don't know if it's possible at this point in the way my daily life is constructed - and workplace apps and two-factor authentication are the biggest parts of that. 

How long do you think you could go without touching your phone?   

Thursday, February 27, 2025

Completed Category: Documentary Feature

My second-to-last completed category!  One more nominee to see after this. 

Documentary Feature Film
Black Box Diaries
No Other Land
Porcelain War
Soundtrack To A Coup d'Etat
Sugarcane

Let me just say, once again, that whether a documentary is interesting or good is not based on the topic.

 There can be an amazing documentary about a subject in which I have no interest that has me riveted. Or, the opposite: a topic I would love to know more about can be covered in a terrible documentary, making for an excruciating 2.5 hours, such as is the case with Soundtrack To A Coup d'Etat.  Holy cow is this a boring look at the mid-twentieth century tragic and murderous foreign policy of Belgium and the U.S., and political shenanigans in the Congo, up to and including the murder of Patrice Lumumba. I am deeply interested in this history! This documentary bored me immensely. Also, it was irritating. There's this whole jazz motif going on, and it drove me straight up a wall.  I really don't like jazz and I'm pretty sure that's related to how much I hate this film.  The film is constructed of various jazz music that is sometimes lyrically appropriate and sometimes relevant because the film at that time is talking about when Louis Armstrong or whoever traveled to Africa at that time -- so many layers, like a piece of jazz music, right?  Ugh. It was awful. There were actually close-ups of people singing where you could see their saliva - gross, shudder.  And the shots of Dizzy Gillespie's puffy cheeks gave me the fantods. Now, on the other hand, the frequent clips of Malcolm X talking were by far a highlight of this film - more of that, please. Less of everything else.  Side note: this is not solely about "We Didn't Start the Fire" (Belgians in the Congo!) but also a fair bit of Car 54 Where Are You?  (Khrushchev's due at Idlewild!) 

Anyway. Onto the four good documentaries! 

Black Box Diaries - haunting, stunning achievement, quite personal while being globally relevant, as one woman documents her pursuit of justice in the aftermath of a sexual assault. Why are men. 

No Other Land -  depressing, infuriating look at oppressively macho Israeli military posturing over a bit of land that they would like to forbid Palestinians to live on, for no discernible reason.  

Porcelain War - still more depressing stuff, with art and nature and beauty struggling to keep their heads above the mass of violent warfare that is the Russian invasion of and war in Ukraine.  

Sugarcane -  another personal depiction that meanders through major trauma and its effects years and decades later on the survivors of "Indian schools" in Canada as well as on their descendants. I really thought this was well done, with the weaving of one personal search for healing amid the wider community and even world search for healing related to this horrible bit of history. 

There is really only one that I can't bear to see win, but my order in which I'd like to see them win:  Sugarcane, Black Box Diaries, Porcelain War  (really, any of those three!), then No Other Land

Order in which I think they'll win: 
Maybe Porcelain War? Or Black Box Diaries.  I might like Sugarcane more than some other people do, but I did notice Lily Gladstone's name as an Executive Producer, which probably means she'll have  successfully campaigned it to some extent.  No Other Land probably won't work for some people. I don't know who votes for Soundtrack to a Coup d'Etat ... Steely Dan fans? Overwrought fever dreaming men? I don't know. 

Which documentary did you think was the best? 



Sunday, January 26, 2025

Awards Season Never Lets Us Down ...

 ...especially if we are expecting something really freaking stupid to happen.  More on that in a sec. 

Here we are in 2025, and it turns out I again forgot to blog for the rest of last year after the Oscars ended. Oops!  Yes, #IAmVeryBusy but that's really no excuse. Ah well, that said, we're back with another year's nominations and it is time to again keep a little online diary.  Let's go! 

This year we once again have a situation where it's easy to complete a whooooole bunch of categories by simply seeing a handful of films.  Look at these numbers:  the excellent films Conclave and A Complete Unknown each have 8 nominations, the wonderful Wicked and the brutal The Brutalist (at least its honest in its title) each have 10, and the ridiculous Emilia Pérez led the pack with 13.  By the way, in case you were wondering if that necessarily means that last one is a good movie, please don't be so naive. Have I taught you nothing about the Oscars over the years? 

Anyway: how did I do on Oscar noms day? 

I don't think anyone is actually reading this here and now, but for the historical record for when my gifts and wisdom are finally realized, let me note that we are in the midst of a tragedy of wildfires in Los Angeles. The worst things about this are of course, the loss of so many innocent animal lives - animals who had no option to escape their burning domestic or wild homes in the fires' paths -  and the ongoing destruction and seeming inability to just make the fires stop. Among the totally inconsequential in the scheme of things effects of the fires was the postponement of the Oscar nominations. That meant that my long-prepared day off work Friday, January 17 was unnecessary, so I did log on and work a bit that morning, and then went to The Brutalist, or as I like to think of it, The Brutal-est, that afternoon. I thought, hmmm, with the postponement of the announcement, I might be able to see all the likely Best Picture contenders before Noms Day!  I had already, at that point, seen Wicked, Conclave, Anora, A Complete Unknown, and Sing Sing. I thought, if I can see The Substance, Emilia Pérez, Nickel Boys, and Dune: Part Two in the next few days, I might be there -- but September 5 might be in there instead of Sing Sing -- nonetheless, I should try... I did end up seeing three of those in time, not Nickel Boys yet, but in the end, it wouldn't have mattered, because I'm Still Here got a Best Pic nom instead of either of those two S-es and I wasn't able to see that before nominations day at any rate. 

That said, as of nominations announcement morning, I already had three completed categories!  Thanks to those aforementioned films getting five billion nods apiece, I had Directing, Supporting Actress, and Editing already complete, and I shall blog about those in the next few days.  Then, on the evening of new-Nominations-Day Thursday January 23, I headed to the theatre down the street and saw Nosferatu (so much yikes!), thus completing two more categories.  Five complete, and I hadn't even written a blog entry!  What a year. 

But this post is for what I think of the nominations overall.  Here's what I think: 

- It is definitely now A Thing to have an international film (if you will) in the ten Best Picture nominations. This year, we get two, sort of.  I'm Still Here is Brazilian and Emilia Pérez is (a f*cking mess but) sort of French although about "Mexico."  Those both got nominated in both the Best Picture and International Feature Film categories.  All I want is for them to both lose International Film and have that prize go to the marvelous Flow, which is about a cat!, and which is also nominated in Animated, another thing that we have seen happen in recent years -- International + Animated, International + Documentary, etc. 

- A while back, Angelina Jolie had a lot of buzz for playing Maria Callas. After seeing the film, I thought she deserved a nomination for digging way deep and playing a really, deeply messed up individual at a really, deeply fraught time at the end of her life. Then her buzz faded, but on nominations morning when they announced Maria in the Cinematography category I perked up: Would this mean Angelina was in?!  Alas, no. 

- Instead, the five Lead Actress nominees were more or less what we thought, even Fernanda Torres for I'm Still Here who had looked more and more sure since her Golden Globes win. She joins other GGlobes winner Demi Moore, whose buzz is building, shoo-ins Mikey Madison and Cynthia Erivo, and the first man to be nominated for Lead Actress, Mr. Juan Carlos Gascon (credited here as "K@rla S0fia" Gascon).  Why is a man nominated for Lead Actress, you ask?  Well, it's because we as a society have jumped the shark and decided that in public discourse, professions, politics, education, and a whole bunch of other places, men can pretend to be women and women can pretend to be men and the meanings of words don't matter because being a man or a woman isn't about being male or female anymore, silly! It's all about the transgender joy!  So, that's really dumb - I mean, really really dumb, as I have elsewhere pointed out - but we knew this was coming, ever since Emilia Pérez did its thing at Cannes.  Is it the worst thing the Oscar nominations have ever done? I mean - well, no. But it is certainly among the top two or three if not the number one absolute dumbest. Gascon is a man pretending to be a woman in real life, and in the film plays a man who "changes" into a woman (again: note, this does not really happen, in real life, ever). Interestingly, this isn't even the reason why the film is terrible. You can make a great film about all kinds of stupid shit, but that is not what Emilia Pérez is.  It's a hot mess. 

- Do we have category fraud this year?  Why, yes, of course we do! This is the Oscars!  In Supporting Actor, co-star of  A Real Pain Kieran Culkin is nominated, and in Supporting Actress, we have not one but TWO category frauds, Zoe Saldana in the mess of Emilia Pérez and Ariana Grande in Wicked. And surprise surprise that they are the two most likely to win, according to pundits. Being on screen for the entire film and even more than the stars can do wonders for your chances of winning Supporting Actress! Wheeeee, category fraud! 

- Were you worried about Diane Warren getting another Original Song nomination?  Again, have I taught you nothing?  She wrote "The Journey" for The Six Triple Eight and secured her spot. Goooo, Diane! We'll talk more about that when I complete that category. 

Well, we have a little over a month, and I have only 24 movies to see (if you count each set of shorts as "a movie" - otherwise I have 21 features and 15 shorts), so there will be time to do this easily, even for those of us who #AreVeryBusy. 

How was your Oscar nominations morning?  What was your favorite nomination? How is your Awards Season going? Which films have you seen? What do you love and hate? 

(What, I can ask questions to the Void. It's totally allowed.) 

Sunday, February 25, 2024

Completed Category: Supporting Actress

 Yesterday I finally saw the new The Color Purple, thus completing a category!



In fact, I didn't just watch the new The Color Purple but instead made a day of it and watched the 1985 movie and then in the evening, this Awards Season's flick, which is an adaptation of an adaptation of an adaptation. You know, some Awards Season jabberers are really throwing around the nonsense that this new movie is "an adaptation of the book."  That is such a lie. For one thing it is based on the musical straight up. Like, your screenplay includes book and songs from the musical. Pretty sure those songs weren't in Alice Walker's book!  (I read it!)  And then, I suppose someone COULD skip over the 1985 film adaptation - but you didn't. It is absolutely referenced and incorporated in many ways.  Multiple cast members are on the record saying this. Let's be real. Anyway, none of that is the point of this post! 

EMILY BLUNT, Oppenheimer: She was fantastic in this. I know, I know, when is she not? But my goodness does she elevate her part to the very very most it can possibly be. You know Christopher Nolan wasn't going to write a killer female part in this manly male man-fest of maleness but Emily Blunt took what was written and made it the absolute most because she's one of the greatest actresses working today, period. I want her to win an Oscar! 

DANIELLE BROOKS, The Color Purple: She was definitely great. The whole talented cast of this was great, but I suppose we had to focus on someone and she sure was strong and confident and funny and heartbreaking and amazing in each of her scenes, so I am very OK with this nomination.  She also mentioned that in at least one scene she consciously paid homage to Oprah (who played the role in the 1985 film this is an adaptation of an adaptation of). Does that help her chances here? I say it couldn't hurt. 

AMERICA FERRERA, Barbie:  I almost forgot about this for a second! (or rather, a month, since the nominations came out)  Of course her monologue went viral last summer as everybody discovered Feminism 101 through Barbie, and listen: I am OK with Feminism 101 - y'all have to start somewhere! -  but she also had a little bit more going on in this film than just that.  Still, even if you score straight up zero picks on your ballot and lose your entire Oscar pool, if you take a side bet about which clip from Barbie will be shown for her clip for this category, you can still win something for the evening.  As for the actual award, here, I think she is in honor-to-be-nominated territory. 

JODIE FOSTER, Nyad:  Oh godz do I want her to win. However! I also have to point out that this was really pushing it on the Supporting vs. Lead thing, which you know is my pet peeve, and on which this year otherwise is doing very well overall.  Jodie really is a co-star of this movie. But she of course gets marketed as Supporting - and not because the role is in fact Character Who Supports The Other Star in her life and quests, but because this charade is the very favorite nonsense Awards Season charade we have to endure every year.  And because that is annoying, I won't be 100% mad when she doesn't win. But I also will be fine if she shocks the hell out of everyone and wins  - which could juuuuuuuust possibly happen because she is so well-liked and connected to SO.MANY. Academy voters, and because her performance was absolutely off-the-charts.  Pitch perfect every single second. 

DA'VINE JOY RANDOLPH, The Holdovers:  You know, as I was just typing her name, I wondered: what did kids with apostrophes in their names do for that bubble back when we filled in the bubbles on the standardized test and scantron answer sheets?  Huh. Have I really never talked about this?  Two of my close friends in high school had punctuation marks in their names. Anyway, Da'Vine (or is it Da'Vine Joy?) has been winning a few statues these past few months and it's looking likely that this will be another for her. It was the scene in the kitchen that did it, I think - but also she does throw a fair amount of sass to Paul Giamatti's character, which he richly deserves I might add.  Everyone loves a misfit friends story (at least I do) and she's a strong, kind, but also fun part of this one. 

Order I want them to win: 
Jodie Foster
Emily Blunt
Da'Vine Joy Randolph
Danielle Brooks
America Ferrera 

Order I think they will win: 
Da'Vine Joy Randolph
maaaaaaaybe Jodie Foster
Emily Blunt
America Ferrera 
Danielle Brooks

They were all so great!  What a cool-ass group of actresses. 

Seriously take that Barbie monologue side bet though, if you can get anyone foolish enough to go against you on it. 


Tuesday, February 20, 2024

Completed Category: Documentary Short

 It's my first completed Shorts category this year, and quite the opposite of last year when I was thwarted and nobody would let me complete all of the nominees before the ceremony and it was mainly this category's fault because they weren't showing at a theatre in Atlanta (although the Animated and Live Action were) and one didn't become available online to rent/stream until last June!  How do I measure a year?  In Oscar nominees watched, that's how! But why dredge up the past? 


Anyway, so the powers that be decided to let me see all the Doc Shorts this year, thank you very much, and this I have now done. 

THE ABCs OF BOOK BANNING:  Hot topics do well at the Docs and at the Shorts and at the Doc Shorts, so this already starts out ahead. Is it well done? Yes. Are the featured people interesting? Yes. Does it invite me to look at this topic in a new way, or offer some fresh perspective?  Honestly not really. This series of reactions and analysis from a bunch of people, mostly young, about banned, challenged, and restricted books is not really breaking any new ground. Does it draw someone in who might not be interested in the topic at first? It does all right. People like charming little kids, right?  (They're not all that little.)  The first group of girls who started us off with their self-assured platitudes were a wee bit obnoxious, but some who get interviewed later are rad. The blond boy with the kind of mullet-look is by far my favorite.  "I just like to know stuff."  Yes. My man. Look for him. He's great. 

THE BARBER OF LITTLE ROCK:  Community development is my jam!  Haha kidding, it's just my job five days a week, as they say. But I fully loved Arlo Washington, his work, his team, the barber college, the way they drove around to show and point out the discrepancies between the predominantly white and predominantly Black communities on either side of a freeway, and the clear, cool-headed examination of the persistent racial wealth gap.  This absolutely featured interesting people, new perspective, and a way of drawing you in. I don't really fault it but it could have been a teeny tiny bit clearer on chronology but not in a way that mattered. Basically, good! Totally OK if it wins. 

ISLAND IN BETWEEN: I liked this one probably more than some people because I like to contemplate China and China-adjacent things and I am always fascinated by Taiwan, both so China and so not right now. This look at the Taiwan island that is just off the coast rightupthisclose to mainland China just really worked for me. But it might float in the middle of the pack here. 

THE LAST REPAIR SHOP: This one, though!  What a beautiful little slice of life, really well done, intimate (yet global in reach), a brilliant interweaving of stories, a profound look at how we really can make a difference.  I am one million percent #TeamTheLastRepairShop.  I always say any film that makes me feel positive feelings about humanity did a damn good job! In this case, the group of co-workers at a musical instrument repair shop and several kids in the Los Angeles Unified School District who have discovered how important playing a musical instrument is to them  tell their close-up stories, and the filmmaker weaves a pitch perfect macro out of the micro. I loved it! 

NAI NAI & WAI PO: Meh. This was kind of one note. Definitely was telling you it was more clever than it was. The premise of a guy documenting his two living grandmothers, who live together, was all right but the execution was...meh. Sometimes weird little ones like this resonate with people though, eye-rollingly to me. 

Order I want them to win: 
The Last Repair Shop
The Barber of Little Rock
Island In Between
The ABCs of Book Banning
Nai Nai & Wai Po

Order I think they will win: 
Like I said, probably The ABCs of Book Banning has the strong upper hand here
The Barber of Little Rock  has a chance
I hope The Last Repair Shop has more of a chance; maybe the L.A. connection will help? 
Nai Nai & Wai Po, ugh
Island In Between - just not sure how much this will wow people

Did you see the Documentary Shorts? 
What do you think? 


Saturday, February 17, 2024

Completed Category: Production Design

I finished two categories by watching Napoleon - two categories with the exact same slate of five nominees!  One of them is Production Design. 

BARBIE: This is the first of these five films that I saw, and this is the category that I most want it to win. And none of these other four have surpassed it in my opinion. It took some toys we had all seen and most of us even held in our hands and made a magical, beautiful world - with compelling undertones. I think the movie as a whole is juuuuuuust a smidge overrated and its takedown of The Patriarchy is to say the very least incomplete, but hey - y'all beginners gotta start somewhere. While the film is flawed, the Production Design is not, at all. You truly believe you are traveling between these two worlds, and that this one really exists out there somewhere, giving you some instruction for how to think about your own world. It will be a travesty when Barbie loses this category. 

KILLERS OF THE FLOWER MOON: This has become a recurring theme here but Scorcese & Company did their jobs and their meticulous research so incredibly well, and created a world to tell us a haunting story, and I think it is a wonderful, scathing, entrancing film. However, in this category it is second place for me. I really don't want it to get shut out, so I won't be mad and throw things if it wins here. The degree of difficulty is more than you might think, with every little bit of house, business, outdoor, indoor, street, gathering, barber shop, car, explosion, you name it perfectly depicted. Strong strong silver medal.  Maybe we could have a tie? 

NAPOLEON: And this one, which I watched last night to complete the category, also did some visually marvelous work. With another incredible degree of difficulty. However, I understand that it also worked some magic with Visual Effects?  At any rate it was stunning, and somehow gorgeous when depicting bloody massacres, so hey - well done everybody.  I know this movie didn't work for a lot of people but I for one massively enjoyed batshit crazy Napoleon and Josephine, and all the other madness. It also made me nostalgic for when I read War and Peace. Mostly, I found it delightfully dark and amusing and weird and a totally solid entry here. 

OPPENHEIMER: Ya know, I recently went to Los Alamos. I've also been all around the Southwest, having grown up in Arizona, and been many times to New Mexico, but only the other year finally went to the actual weird little made-up town that still sits there in the middle of a gorgeous landscape where they unleashed hellish fury, terrifying and killing untold number of animals and plants, before moving on to kill hundreds of thousands of Japanese humans. You have to show i.d. to drive into the actual town. Anyway, I honestly loved the film Oppenheimer and I also honestly don't think this had the same degree of difficulty as several others in this category, but mostly I am going to have to say something here about the still-unanswered (as far as I can tell) 50-star flag thing. Much has been made of the use of USA flags with 50-stars in a climactic scene set when there were only 48 states. Some insist that director Christopher Nolan did it on purpose, with that scene in color being Oppenheimer's memory, envisioned  from 50-state 1963. I think those insisters are reaching. Some claim to have been extras in that scene and report (on the internet) that the flags were some cheap bulk props brought in, which would be such an astoundingly bonehead mistake that it's hard to believe -- but then again, look at the stupid things humans do on the regular, like destroy all the life they come across. Anyway, I know Oppenheimer is going to win something, but I'm scratching it from this category. 

POOR THINGS: I wish I could scratch Poor Things from existence. It doesn't get better any time I have to write about it as the weeks pass. However, I will say that this Production Design category is kinda like how I was for Editing with Everything Everywhere All At Once. Terrible, excruciating movie that I wish I had never had to sit through, but this one category was sure done well. And that, I fear, is why it will probably beat Barbie, much to my dismay. 

Order that I would like them to win: 
Barbie
Killers of the Flower Moon 
Poor Things
Napoleon
Oppenheimer


Order that I think they will win: 
Poor Things
Oppenheimer
Barbie
Killers of the Flower Moon 
Napoleon
 

Oh, how I want Academy voters to do the right thing

 



Saturday, May 08, 2021

Not milk?

I am once again asking you to, when presented with a complaint about the problem of paying a 75-cent or even one-damn-dollar upcharge for a non-dairy milk, not reply with something oversimplified and inaccurate about the "cost" of non-dairy milks. 

It's different from, for example, adding an espresso shot, which might cost 50 more cents of espresso. First of all, in latte situations, when someone gets oat latte instead of cow latte, you may be adding ("costing more") oat milk but you are ALSO SUBTRACTING the cow milk. Did you account for that in your "cost"? 

Secondly, when we're talking about adding a splash of soy milk to coffee, it should be far less than using the latte amount of the soy milk . Starbucks is correct to not charge for a soy splash. Dunkin' needs to get itself together on this. 

Third, the alt-milk per-drink "costs" at all coffee shops, chain and independents, are nonsense.  I can buy an almond or soy or whatever milk carton for $3 in any store retail -- and that amount of milk is way the heck more than 3 drinks, but you want to charge a third of that carton price for adding non-dairy to ONE drink? AND, coffee shops get a lesser-per-carton wholesale price to begin with. 

Furthermore, dairy milk is environmentally less sustainable, plus nightmarishly cruel to calves and mother cows, yanking away a newborn baby. So the ethical, morally sound thing to do would be to upcharge for dairy even if there were some accurate "cost." (Plus the dairy milk does have a financial cost, but it is massively produced and subsidized and powerfully lobbied. You aren't paying the true cost of cow milk. Also, in addition to the heavily subsidized dairy lobby finances, there is very much a greater "cost" for cow milk, but you are paying it with the Earth, desperate cows, tortured calves, and your soul.) 

Finally, even if the coffee shop charges a b.s. dollar for oat milk normally, a free drink should be a free drink. When we redeem our points, the oat/almond/soy whatever should be completely and totally $0.00 free of charge, but some locations upcharge for the alt-milks in a "free" rewards drink.  That is terrible. There really is a lot more going on here than "oh it costs more." 

I've noted before that when I find a coffee shop who gives free soy, almond, etc. and instead upcharges for dairy, they will have my business forever. 

Oh yeah, and, humans? If you aren't at the VERY dang least using a non-dairy milk in your cereal now, you need to make this life correction immediately. It is unconscionable to continue to buy rip-the-calf-away milk for your cereal, no matter how whiny you are about needing dairy milk for baking, coffee, and taste, or in your delusional "nutrition" uses. If you "don't like" the taste of non-dairy milk in cereal, you are eating. the. wrong. cereal. -- you should be tasting the cereal, not the milk. 

Feel free to share my words with your coffee shops and everyone you know. 

Do better. 
#upchargefordairy 



Wednesday, February 13, 2019

The Twelve Days of Oscar, Day 1:
Supporting Actress and Adapted Screenplay

I mean, not that I've blogged whatsoever in the past nine months, and not that I've been anything but scrambling to get my Oscar nominees viewing situation under control, but anyway, here we are! Let's see if we can't blather about the Oscars each of these next twelve glorious days as we slide into ceremony Sunday; what do ya say?

Welcome back to my Twelve Days of Oscar, in which I will (attempt to) blog about two categories per day each of these twelve days! I will mostly do the categories in a seemingly super-random order that is actually based on what I've completed seeing, but I'll justify it somehow, never fear.

For example, today it totally makes sense to look at Supporting Actress, because why not talk about this award early on, just as it's given out so early in the show sometimes (and then, some argue, the winner is promptly forgotten for all time...?)   And since that category overlaps in nominations this year with screenplay categories, why not lump'em together and do a screenplay category today as well? Except it'll have to be Adapted Screenplay, because that's the one for which I've already seen all five.

Actress in a Supporting RoleThe nominees are:
Regina King, If Beale Street Could Talk
Marina de Tavira, Roma
Rachel Weisz, The Favourite
Emma Stone, The Favourite
Amy Adams, Vice

In just what order did I list those names, above? In my order of preference? In order of how much I liked the movie? When I saw the movie? Who has the best chance to win? No, no, no, and no. I listed them in order, from most accurate to least accurate, of which roles could properly be described as Supporting Actress roles. Amy Adams' role, the presumed favorite to win, clearly should not be considered supporting. Alas and alack, we have to go through this rigmarole every year of marketing an actress who stars in a film as "supporting" so she has a "better chance" to win her Oscar. Never mind the "This-is-what-Lead-Roles-look-like" aspect of this misogyny, it is such an unfair charade and to know me is to know that it is one of the (very few!) things I hate about the Oscars. Tiresome.

So, no, I don't think that Amy Adams should win, in that I don't think she should win in THIS category. If she were being considered for Lead, as she should be, as Viola Davis should have been for Fences, and as Alicia Vikander should have been for The Danish Girl, and so on and so forth, then maybe. The other mildly annoying factor to consider here is that she's gonna get some make-up Oscar/"lifetime" achievement (I mean, she's still young) votes because people want to finally reward her with an Academy win after nominating her a whole bunch over the last decade plus of awards seasons.

Speaking of that, so Amy Adams has been Oscar-nominated five previous times, with Vice being her sixth. Can you name the other five films? Answers will appear below at the bottom of this post, so make your guess before scrolling down. Hint: four were for Supporting (actual supporting) roles, and one was for Lead.

What about this year's other nominated actresses? Any previous nominees among them? You bet! There are even previous winners! Our other redhead, Emma Stone -- wait, is Marina de Tavira a redhead? Roma was in black and white, so who knows? -  has two previous nods, one Supporting for Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (ugh) and one Lead for La La Land (massive ugh, but she won) (the film didn't, though! ha ha ha, remember that?!)  And Rachel Weisz won for Supporting for The Constant Gardener, her only previous acting Oscar nom.

Meanwhile, Regina King was really good in If Beale Street Could Talk, which I think was just a sublime and incredible film, and I really think she should be rewarded, but I guess she'll have to be honored just to be nominated, because frankly, Amy Adams' competition might actually come from Marina de Tavira, who by the way y'all I think might indeed have red hair, but maybe only sometimes, dyed, which means she's not actually a redhead,  in Roma. This is because everyone (in Hollywood) (the industry, not the city) not only loves Roma but is super-proud of themselves for loving Roma, the little Netfllix-produced film that could (upset the notion that only traditional major studios or at least indies with lots of cool connections, but not online streaming services, can produce Best Picture Winners).

Need another hint about Amy Adams? Two of her noms were for films with one-word titles and two were for films with The [Something] two-word titles.

Oh yeah, I forgot to give my opinion about the actresses in The Favourite, who probably won't win because if anything they'll split the vote. Um... it was a weird movie. It gave me anxiety to watch it because the whole time I was freaking out about the caged rabbits. They were good performances and all, but... meh. It's just not my Favourite.

Adapted Screenplay The nominees are:
The Ballad of Buster Scruggs
If Beale Street Could Talk
A Star Is Born
Can You Ever Forgive Me?
BlacKkKlansman


Zero question here, folks, because I want BlacKkKlansman to win everything it was nominated for. This is always a tricky category for me when I haven't read all the books/consumed the previously published material from which these screenplays were adapted. That's right, I've never seen any of the previous Stars who were Born, and I've not yet read the James Baldwin nor the Lee Israel nor the Ron Stallworth books. And what the hell is The Ballad of Buster Scruggs based on? The Coen Brothers' latest fever dream?  Oh, look, I just checked, and basically, yes: it's based on short stories written by the Coens over a bunch of years. Yeah, I knew watching it that those vignettes came from their weird imaginative brains, and by the way for those who haven't yet seen it, they are kind of grisly and effed up. And I have a strong case to make that it isn't really a movie at all, just a series of unconnected vignettes. (Connection = "the Old West."  Connection = the Coens want another Oscar contender, so let's not make this just a streaming Netflix series.)  Anyway, as I was saying, BlacKkKlansman is great and one of my top films of the year and I want it to win everything, so that's my pick in this category, although I did like Can You Ever Forgive Me? and If Beale Street Could Talk a lot, and I couldn't look away from A Star Is Born, really, no matter what else around me might have tried to distract me, as it was just this glorious train wreck of Bradley Cooper-dom and the downward spiral of the rich and famous and some not-too-shabby Gaga and lots of bits about songwriting, and boy was it compelling viewing.

Although I personally want BlacKkKlansman to win, I don't know that it will. Beale Street could possibly take this award; it was so beautifully rendered. I would feel wrong if Can You Ever Forgive Me? won because it's so weird to have a writer in the first place writing a "true" account about stuff she made up... I just don't know how I feel about that to begin with. And Buster Scruggs  needs to just, no.

So there we have it! I'm rooting for Regina and BlacKkKlansman and my hopes will probably be dashed. Who are your picks?

Supporting Actress Answer: Amy Adams was previously nominated for Junebug, Doubt, The Fighter, The Master, and American Hustle. That last one was a Lead Actress nomination.

Saturday, March 03, 2018

Twelve Days of Oscars, Day 11: Documentary Feature and Documentary Shorts

Let's talk docs!

I love documentary film. Love, love, love. This is one of my favorite Academy Awards categories, and I love seeking out and watching the nominated films, though they can occasionally be a little harder to come by than the feature fiction film noms. It has definitely gotten easier over the years, what with Netflix and online streaming and more web site accessibility to the filmmakers and whatnot. It was fifteen years ago that I really started paying tons of attention to this category, specifically with my boy Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine, and that very memorable Oscar win which happened the same week we (Dubya/"we") went to war in Iraq and I quit smoking and... that's a story I tell elsewhere.

Here, let's look at this year's nominees:

Documentary Feature:
Abacus: Small Enough to Jail, Faces Places, Icarus, Last Men in Aleppo, Strong Island

Documentary Short:
Heroin(e), Edith + Eddie, Heaven Is a Traffic Jam on the 405, Knife Skills, Traffic Stop

Unfortunately, I have been busy and scattered and unable to complete my Oscars checklist before today's ceremony, and the Documentary Feature category, despite being one of my favorites, is my least complete. I've only seen Abacus: Small Enough to Jail, which I really liked. It's about a family-owned bank in New York City that serves the Chinese immigrant community and was prosecuted in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis for, well, nothing to be guilty of, really, while "too big to fail" banks kept on doing their greedy illegal things. The family in Abacus... is so awesome and it's a really good documentary. I'm so lame for not having seen the others; I've been hearing about Faces Places for months, and I have Last Men in Aleppo recorded off of PBS but haven't found time to watch... I don't know if Icarus or Strong Island will be able to beat the appeal of voting for Agnes Varda's Faces Places, because she is getting an honorary Oscar this year and she would be the first woman to get an honorary and competitive Oscar in the same year. That would be such a fun fact. (Some men have done that, including Walt Disney.)

Documentary shorts, though, I saw. I love Heroin(e) a lot. It follows people, including three main women, dealing with the heroin epidemic and overdose crises in Huntington, West Virginia. The three women are helping heroin addicts in very different ways, some through official work, some through less official outreach, all through compassion, problem-solving, and tackling the problem in ways our societal systems are clearly not. You'll find yourself smiling so big while watching drug court scenes. It's great. But it's also a sobering reminder of how desperately this good work is needed. I would love for this short to win the Oscar.

Knife Skills also documents outreach to people who've had trouble, in this case former convicts who go through a culinary training program and work at a fancy restaurant, and the troubles that ensue along the way. Traffic Stop, very timely, is about a black woman body slammed to the ground by a cop during her traffic stop, and I think it does a really good job of exploring how that was preventable while doing more than issuing general platitudes. It was a strength of that film that you watch what happens and then later hear the cop describe what happened. He never speaks a lie or distorts the facts, really, and when you hear them from him perspective you're like -- oh my god. Yes, that's what happened. And why couldn't you - or thousands of other cops - in that situation make it better instead of worse? It was very interesting. I think a lot of people like Heaven Is a Traffic Jam on the 405, which has very little to do with traffic and is instead a weird, trippy examination of a traumatized woman who grapples with her life and issues, among them childhood and mental health issues, with art and other tactics. Edith + Eddie is a sad story - an old newlywed couple (like 95, seriously) separated when the daughter and legal guardian of the woman take over because she is judged not competent to make her own legal decisions. It wasn't as well made of a film, but was kind of like watching a long, fairly interesting news story.

All right, who's going to win?

Documentary Feature: I can't pick mine, because I'm ignorant here. I think Faces Places might win.
Documentary Short: I want Heroin(e).  It could be that or either of the Traffic ones though.

This is Oscar weekend, people! My own personal "New Year's Eve"-level festivity!



Tuesday, January 09, 2018

Oprah and the 2020 Vision

Well, I wasn't exactly plotting this as my Happy New Year! post, but since there are about fourteen different arguments I'm involved in on various Facebook threads regarding this topic, thought I might as well weigh in here for all and sundry...

We're here to talk about the Golden Globes, Oprah, and the trending idea of "Oprah for President."

First and foremost, it has come to my attention that a significant portion of y'all, whoever y'all may be (feel free to mis/interpret that to include yourself or not - I don't really care), missed the set-up in Golden Globes show host Seth Meyers' opening monologue. Just last night I had to explain this to someone in a bar who had no idea it had happened. I'll explain it again here, because if you're coming late to the party and claiming that the #Oprah2020 response to her lifetime achievement award acceptance speech is half-baked, you should probably know that you are the half-baked one, in that you have only been served half of this entree. To wit:

-In 2011, Seth Meyers and Barack Obama famously roasted and jabbed and mocked TheDonaldTrump at the White House Correspondents Dinner, where rich and powerful people do that to each other annually (usually including the current president, except not this past year because we don't currently have a president, just a usurping twit), and since then there has been a kind of ongoing half-joke rumor that Seth Meyers pitilessly mocking Trump to his face about wanting to be president is what cemented the decision in TrumptyDumpty's mind that he'd run. Is it true that Seth Meyers' words had that effect on Trump? Don't know/don't care. But it has been a recurring theme since then to ask Meyers about it in interviews (see, e.g., him on Fresh Air) and for him to half-jokingly/half-wistfully say maybe he accidentally is responsible for the disaster through which we're all now living. Ha.
-At the Golden Globes this past Sunday, January 7, 2018, Seth Meyers referenced his "responsibility" for #TrumptyDumpty and said that he doesn't know if it works, but just in case... and then he riffed along these lines: "Oprah, you can NEVER be president! You should not run in 2020! Tom Hanks, you can never ever be vice-president! You're too nice!"  Reaction shots of Oprah and Hanks in the crowd. Laughter all around. Then, Seth Meyers staring into the camera: "And now, we just wait and see."

Get it? It was funny, and brilliant, and spot fucking on, as comedy should be.

So if you missed that, you missed the entire planting of the night's seed, as it were.

Anyway, then later in the evening Oprah got the Cecil B. DeMille Award for her outstanding contributions to the world of entertainment. Remember when Meryl Streep got that award last year? I sure do. See, e.g., this most wonderful of Tweets. In keeping with the evening's/Hollywood's/the world's life moment theme of #TIMESUP and declaring a new day in terms of the shite women must endlessly face, especially when they dare to have power or have their voices heard (see, e.g., Hillary Rodham Clinton, you goddamn vast right-wing conspiracy that has absolutely ruined for the rest of us what could have been a perfectly nice life), Oprah gave a rousing speech that many, many, many of us found moving and inspiring. Because she is, among other things, moving, inspiring, smart, experienced, a leader, a visionary, talented, philanthropic, gutsy, bold, powerful, eloquent, life-affirming, and - not to be missed - a black woman. You're goddamn right I'd be happy to hand her whatever job she wanted.

I highly doubt she wants to be president. Neither does the unstable, decidedly non-genius, usurping twit currently pretending to do that job.

I am not starting or joining any #Oprah2020 campaign.

No, I don't think we should be plucking our presidential candidates out of the "world of entertainment" - see, e.g., Ronald Reagan and Pat Robertson, two such pluckees who should never have been presidential candidates.

But y'all (again, if you're not part of that y'all, don't take it personally, but if you are, please take it VERY personally indeed) made Hillary Rodham Clinton, one of the smartest and most qualified presidential candidates of all time, run against just such a pluckee and you acted like he had any business being there. Any of you who did that -- any of you who ever for so much as one second pretended he had a legitimate claim to being a qualified presidential candidate - goddamn you to hell.

All of the racism and misogyny that has built this nation has led us to this moment: we have an actual usurping twit unstable "button"-wielding cretin in charge of actual things, and instead of being outraged about that this week (and every week), you want to point out to me that it is ridiculous that people are hashtagging #Oprah2020.

Yes, it is ridiculous.

Your bed is made. Lie down.

Thursday, July 06, 2017

Terry Talks the Talk and Walks All the Walks

We need to talk about Terry Tempest Williams now. After you read my blog, run, don't walk, to your local bookstore and buy one of her books. Yes, you could "just go on Amazon" (shudder - does it have to be Amazon? Bookstores do have web sites, you know) but I'd like to think you might not
want to make this purchase from Amazon, if you think enough about all that Terry Tempest Williams is. So let's talk about her. Settle in. Get comfortable. But also? Get uncomfortable.

From http://www.coyoteclan.com/bio.html
Get uncomfortable, yes. Why do I say that? Because it will be to your benefit to get uncomfortable once in a while.

And it could possibly be to Earth's benefit as well. That's one of the points TTW made Wednesday night in her author appearance at Women and Children First bookstore, where she discussed  The Hour of Land: A Personal Topography of America's National Parks and the current state of the country, humanity, and the planet. She was talking about her recent semester as a visiting professor at Dartmouth and the toughest class she ever taught, she said, because of the way the people in the classroom challenged her. She described a classroom in which she was accused, sometimes rightfully, of not understanding young activists as much as she should or of needing to learn more about what it means to be queer, which she did, and in which people sometimes said things like, "All this talk of sexual assault is irrelevant to my life" or "My brown body does not matter in any of these books you have assigned." But, she said, instead of rupturing, they kept at it, and she learned from them, and they learned from each other. She said that she told them on the first day "This is not a safe space" and if they were looking for that they were in the wrong place. It was a supportive space - but not a safe space, because writing is not a safe space. (<--her words)

Also, our world is not a safe space right now. (<--my words)

But writing, among other courageous acts of resistance, may help us.


It would be hard for me to overstate the value of Terry Tempest Williams' words. Others agree with me. See, e.g., this bit of a book review from The New York Times. (right)

At the bookstore appearance, TTW talked about the land in Utah, her homeland, which she described as a formerly rich desert that has been mined so much it now looks like an exposed nervous system.

During the Q&A period, a young audience person from Florida asked how to cope when, in the young person's lifetime, the Everglades and Dry Tortugas National Park disappear underwater. "Don't look away," Terry said.

I think that's what we all do so damn much of, looking away. Because:
-It's uncomfortable.
-It's hard.
-I can't do anything about it.
-I just can't deal.

Click click click click click click ...

A frenzy of looking away. Our looking away takes many forms, and we can talk about some more of those in a minute.

Like many people, I first came to Terry Tempest Williams' writing with Refuge: An Unnatural History of Family and Place. It, and she, were big in the circles I ran in when I was 18, and I looked forward to reading it when it was assigned in my Women in Literature class taught by the inimitable Cecilia Konchar Farr during her last semester in Utah (that's another story for another time). I was in the small group that did our semester project on Refuge, and that project became a pilgrimage to the Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge, a class presentation done in the style of a church program (you'll understand why when you read the book), and then a protest demonstration. Cecilia dubbed us the "Refuge Radicals." You can see how all this is maybe a formative part of me, or perhaps an early recognition of all that I am.

But it's not about me--Refuge has spoken to so many people, with its tale of family, cancer, Earth, birds, cycles, destruction, and how we can go on. Terry Tempest Williams talked in this bookstore appearance about her Chinese translator of Refuge. TTW just recently got back from China. ("Beijing air," she said when she interrupted her reading for a small bout of coughing. "Also Salt Lake City air," she added.) The Chinese woman had commented that Terry's work was becoming more political and needed more beauty. Terry countered that that translator's work could maybe use more politics and less emphasis on beauty. They laughed. They are friends. They are each doing what they can, courageously.

We can be both compassionate and harsh. AT THE SAME TIME. I thrilled to hear TTW say that. I know that, and I know what it is to be put in a box, to be told if I'm one I'm not the other. Now, she clearly has a demeanor that would never be mistaken for mine; I'm sure you'll find her gentler, but don't you go thinking that she is not fierce. She fights, and with her life's work as a writer and naturalist she has fought and fought and fought for this land we are trampling, we the human race.

What are we racing toward?

Whatever it is, I don't think you need to worry about people's feelings getting hurt when I say things to them about the destruction on the path. To know me is to know that of all the possible motives for words and actions, wanton malice isn't mine. Maybe when someone says something "intense" we can benefit from hearing them instead of wishing they would speak the way we would have them speak.

"Smile." "Be sweet." Nah. Let's get uncomfortable. As TTW reminded us, we need to have the courage. Writing. Listening. Saying "That's bullshit."  Saying "Thank you, I understand you now. I've heard you."  ALL of these are necessary if we're going to have any hope whatsoever of saving our planet from human-wrought death and destruction. (Humanity itself, it has to be said, may not be worth saving.)

I know, I know, you think humanity is special, unique, privileged, chosen, blessed.  If you had heard Terry Tempest Williams talk about the bison she recently saw in Yellowstone, I think you might have shed tears along with me. I don't feel entitled to retell her story -- I hope you can hear it from her someday -- but I will tell you that in it, bison were grieving the loss of one of their own, and TTW reminded us that we are not the only species living, breathing, and grieving here with loved ones. My own deepest wish in this world is that you, each of you, each of us, will join in opening the cages and letting each being live the wild life it was meant to live. You might not be ready to listen to the trees and hear their message, as TTW did; you might not be ready to know how much the land matters, more than you are prepared to admit (she can help you, though). But I expect you to try to do better. And to not look away.

It's uncomfortable. It's hard. I can't do anything about it. I just can't deal.

It's uncomfortable to think about how much animals suffer because we, unlike the wolf Terry Tempest Williams observed in Yellowstone, don't go in for a quick kill with our jaws at the throat. We have a slow, laborious, monstrous industrialized meat process, from factory farm to slaughterhouse line where they are herded and trapped on conveyor belts, watching their fellows be killed in front of them, held tight with no escape possible, because we don't care how many billions of people there are -- we demand large animal livestock meat for all of them. It is one of the most environmentally irresponsible things we do in addition to being cruel. Do you think about this when you plan your meat menus? Or is it too "hard" to eat meat just once a week?  "Don't look away," Terry Tempest Williams said.

It's hard to live without:
-bacon
-driving
-electricity
-hot water
So we live a life of fossil fuel consumption. But we can think about it.  How else are you going to get better? Don't look away.

People tell me they love rabbits. Their child loves rabbits. And so what do they do? Get a "pet" rabbit, and lock it in a cage. Alone. A rabbit, for merciful god's sake, alone with no other companion of its species, locked in a cage.  How DARE anyone cage an animal as a pet? Where does such almighty hubris come from?

I expect better of you. I expect you to not look away when your friend/neighbor/associate puts a sentient being in a cage, or declaws a cat to "save" their precious furniture. It's furniture. An object you purchased, and you think it's better than a life. A living body. I expect so much better of humans, and I am so disappointed.

You can't do anything about it? Well, you can not look away when sentient beings suffer so that you can have:
-medicine
-a Coach bag
-iPhones
-milk

You just can't deal. But you sure can upgrade your smartphone! The planned obsolescence of technology rapes the earth. That's a fact. Don't look away from it.

Milk. Ye.Gods. Milk, seriously, is one of the most grotesque things humanity does. No other species suckles at the breast of a different animal unless it's a unique, life-threatening emergency. Humans, though? We've got an entire industry, a multi-million dollar industry, with one of THE most powerful lobbies known to man (and they are, largely, men with that power), that has you 100% convinced you need milk for nutrition (you don't), that if you've "got milk" you're all set (for being overweight and higher cancer risk, maybe), that milk does a body good (whose body? not yours, not the raped mother cow nor the calf taken away from her who was entitled to the milk her body produced, not the imprisoned body kept captive and not moving while it is milked, day in and day out, like a machine, by a machine, for years, just for your cereal and your latte in which you could replace the dairy product with soy milk, almond milk, oat milk, hemp milk, rice milk, cashew milk...)   DON'T look away! Don't! Look at this. Look at your part in it. Look at what it says about our (lack of) respect for the animals and the land.

Terry Tempest Williams didn't say anything about milk in the bookstore. I'm just demonstrating that we are participating in the destruction of our planet, on both micro and macro scales, daily, because of our sheer disregard for the lives all around us - of trees, grassland, cows, wolves, national parks...you name it.

With tears in her eyes, she answered the question about how to cope with the loss of our planet's land by saying, "I don't know. But don't look away."

This is my testimony. I'm not telling you to never consume an animal product. I know that life is suffering. I KNOW this is true. And I've read Ishmael by Daniel Quinn. Have you? I understand what it means to be a species on this planet. I don't think humanity quite does. The other species seem to understand that they aren't the only goddamned species. (And if god had any sense, he would damn us, I believe, humans being the rotten lot we are.) (I mean like if he existed and stuff.)

I am telling you you should read TTW's book about our national parks and think about what it means that we have an occupying U.S. administration actively dismantling any protections our public lands have.

You will now be able to go hunt grizzly bears. That's apparently how we "make America great again." It's an absolute horror show.

TTW praised Aldo Leopold and the Leopold family, who have tracked the changes for years and demonstrated that the climate is changing and altering the landscape. Aldo Leopold's A Sand County Almanac (so Midwestern!) is another book I read as an English major, as I was entering the world of Terry Tempest Williams, Edward Abbey, Wendell Berry, and all the Western naturalists who made me understand how much I loved my Arizona, Southwest, and West homelands, who made me see how much the "empty" lands and open spaces can teach us. All these writers have been warning us about the ways we're changing the climate, the landscape, the planet. For years. Listen. Let's not look away.

Terry Tempest Williams and I come from some of the same places, both geographical and religious. We have both grappled and questioned, each in our own ways. One thing our upbringing taught us, though, is the power of bearing testimony. It's remarkable, really, that a religion most people see as "cult-like" (it's not, and we'll have that discussion another day, too) actually hands over the bulk of the church meeting, once a month, to whoever wants to come up to the open microphone. Well, this Earth we're on needs a giant testimony meeting right now. Don't tell people to be quiet and "avoid politics." Don't look away. Don't tell people they're "not being nice." Don't worry about offending someone when you call them out on their behavior. Don't think of it as inappropriate to remind someone that by their lifestyle they're encouraging sweatshops, imprisonment, torture, hideous slaughter, trafficking, death, endangered species, and the flooding of our planet (Noah's ark, anyone?) I can't think of anything MORE appropriate than issuing the warning, loud and clear, from every bully pulpit - social media, face-to-face, or whatever else you can get your hands and vocal chords on.

This is my testimony, and I say it in the name of all that is good and holy in this universe: we've got to think about the land. We've got to think about Earth. We've got to think about the other species on it. Humanity might be doomed, or you might have a slight, tiny, glimmer of a chance. It would help you if you start listening to and understanding the likes of Terry Tempest Williams.

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

To end or not to end the Facebreak

I didn't really mean to give up Facebook for Lent. I don't even celebrate Lent. Wait, observe Lent. Participate in Lent? See, that's how much I don't....do whatever it is that I don't do with regards to Lent; I don't even know what verb to use. I grew up going to church, but it was a church that didn't really shove the whole pick-something-to-give-up-for-40-days thing down our throats. And now I've goodbyed to all that church stuff, so Lent is one of those things I watch other people do, like when my friends give up drinking for that whole time but still play on our pub quiz trivia team, which is rather stalwart of them, don't you think?

But what happened this year was, I had an incident that made me suddenly and forcefully decide I needed to reconsider my relationship to Facebook, specifically, the extent to which I rely on it to function as it says it does, to live up to its own standards, to not mess up. Of course Facebook messes up - nothing/nobody is perfect and all that, but we count on it not to. That's dangerous. It certainly worked out to be dangerous for me. (Details? Yeeeahhh...maybe I can get into the details later. I'm working on a project about that.)

And so, reminding myself of that time in law school when I grounded myself from going into Manhattan for one month because I was not proud of the alcohol choices I had made there, a few weeks ago I suddenly and forcefully just decided I should reconsider my reliance on Facebook being reliable by not relying on it, that is to say, not logging on, until I had accomplished a specific professional goal. And it just so happened that this whole incident went down on the night of Mardi Gras, with Ash Wednesday upon us. That didn't really dawn on me until a couple of days later, though, when I suddenly was like, Oh hey! I could give up Facebook for Lent! To which I responded to myself, What? A 40-day Facebreak? To which my first self responded, That reply shows me (us?) how much you need a 40-day Facebreak. (Let the record reflect that, see, I didn't even know that Lent actually lasts longer than 40 days, which is very confusing, and further evidence of how much I really don't do the Lent thing. Except when I apparently do.)

And so here we are, honing in on Easter, and as everyone hunts for eggs and bites bunnies to see if they're solid or hollow and remembers that after three days the Lord Is Risen, I'll be all mission-accomplished and I can actually check Facebook and see just what the hell has happened there for the last month and a half.

Although, you know, speaking of amounts of days, I've always been kind of confused by that whole "after three days the stone was rolled away bit" because I mean, isn't the whole thing that he was crucified on Friday night? And on Sunday morning he'd already fled the tomb and risen? That's basically a day and a half. Ya know? But we call it three days.

Counting days is hard, I guess, when it's Lenten time.

But the real question is, what should I DO if/when I end my Facebreak and rejoin the party? Any suggestions? What should be my first move? Will I have a million notifications to deal with? Will all my algorithms be hopelessly altered? Will I find out I have missed some crucial message offering me a million dollars or my dream job or trip around the world? No, but seriously, have you ever taken a long Facebreak? What did you do at the end of it?

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

Milk vs. Human Kindness

An Open Letter to Rep. Peter Welch of Vermont, his constituent dairy farmers, et. al. 

Representative Welch, I read with interest an article (by Cleve R. Wootson Jr. of the Washington Post printed in the Chicago Tribune) about a letter signed by 20 U.S. legislators demanding the FDA require makers of soy milk, almond milk, and so forth to drop the word "milk" from their labels.

If it doesn't come from an animal, the word "milk" doesn't belong, the article said, summarizing your point. Of course, your own quote a couple of paragraphs later gets to the heart of the matter (or at least, why your heart's in it): these drinks are being placed in the dairy aisle (the outrage!) "right next to milk" you say, adding that dairy is "really crucial" in Vermont and much of "rural America," and dairy farmers are "hanging on by their fingernails."

To which I can only say: really? The end of the dairy industry as we know it? This could not happen soon enough!

Sometimes, we simply have to accept that a job that has been done for hundreds of years won't be with us forever. We have to accept that just because a profession has been in our family for generations doesn't mean we are entitled to it. We also have to accept that this might be for the better.

Often, it's technology that eliminates a job: consider the lamplighter whose gig was made unnecessary by our wired streetlights, or the telegraph and switchboard operators that have given way to ever speedier and more digital technologies, or even the bowling alley pinsetters whose work is now done by simple machine movement.

Sometimes, though, it's a moral goodness that eliminates a job. Where, now, are the slave traders that kidnapped thousands of humans, cruelly confined them, separated them from family members, and forced them into lives of suffering and sorrow that bore no hint of justice?

Please, Representative Welch, and dairy farmers of Vermont, open your hearts and minds to think about WHY people are buying more and more alternative "milks" and less and less of your cruel, unnecessary product.

We don't want to support an industry that relies on confining sentient beings.

We don't want to have adult females impregnated, only to then have their calves taken away (sometimes just to be slaughtered - a true wasted life).

Do you vouch for the health and safety of the cows on your constituents' dairy farms? Can you possibly assure us that the cows of your industry are not living lives of misery? You speak of farmers metaphorically "hanging by their fingernails" but what about newborn calves stolen from their mothers who are actually trying to cling to life?  Or adult cows living in years of imprisonment, unable to have the simple freedom to walk or turn or roam?

Perhaps people would buy more of your milk, so "crucial" in Vermont, if you could assure us it isn't manufactured in cruelty.

On the other hand, maybe we would continue to reduce the amount of dairy milk we consume, because as the populace at large learns more and more about how to healthily sustain and nourish ourselves, we logically turn away from your "crucial" product.

We might continue to realize on a grand scale that we simply don't need milk. Despite the years of successful lobbying, despite your oh-so-powerful Vermont/rural America industry that has brainwashed minds young and old with slogans like "Got milk?" and "It does a body good!" we know that it doesn't do all that much "good" for our bodies at all.

Humans do NOT need cows' milk. Drop the tired old argument about calcium (available in plenty other foods). Despite your having convinced so many of them that they do, humans who have been weaned from their mothers after breastfeeding should take a hint from the rest of their fellow mammals and move on to other foods.

Where else in the class Mammalia do you see animals suckling at the breast of another species? Do you see tigers feeding at the breast of camels? Raccoons drinking from wolves? When someone forwards an "aw, shucks" heartstring-tugging photo of a mother dog letting the poor, abandoned kitten drink milk along with the puppy litter, it's interesting BECAUSE it's an anomaly. It's an emergency situation, not a way of life. Yes, humans would be doing right and good to feed an abandoned human baby who had no mother from a cow's udder in order to save the human baby's life. That does not even remotely justify an industry of pain and terror. Those mother-puppy-feeds-the-kitten stories demonstrate the milk of canine kindness -- not a bunch of inhumane humans locking bovine species into captive servitude to create an industry of suffering,

And by the way? Milk and dairy really aren't that healthy. You might be amazed at how much better you feel when you eliminate dairy from your diet,  how easily you shed those few pounds of bloated abdomen that just accumulate and hang out when you're a milk drinker,

As a legislator, a position that purports to be about service and leadership, you ought to be spending your time and Congressional efforts creating sustainable, forward-thinking jobs and opportunities, rather than clinging to antiquated notions and perpetuating industries that have become completely out of control in the modern age as they scramble to produce enough for too many millions of greedy, entitled humans. You should be encouraging Vermont and others to build a healthy, happy future.

Is it acceptable for a rural farmer to have a couple of cows, milk them to provide for the family, and perhaps sell to a few local village households, while NOT removing and killing the calves, and while NOT keeping the mother penned but instead allowing her to be a free, roaming animal? Sure.

Is the massive dairy industry lobby that controls our nation now acceptable? Good god, no.

Please reconsider your ideas and strategy, and please try to use your position and your voice to actually do some (human and cow) bodies good.

Sunday, December 18, 2016

One More Day Before the Storm

As Macbeth said, "Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow..."  

But I do believe that tomorrow, Monday, December 19th, will in fact signify something.
The future, which occurs after the present

I've had this super-weird confluence of personal, professional, and political timing, which all seem to be coming to a frothy head tomorrow. So, when I woke up today (Sunday, December 18th) and Facebook was offering up Fb memories of our three-years-ago trip to Hong Kong Disney, I decided this image of me at Tomorrowland says something important.

Tomorrow means hope. It's not all gloom and doom creeping in at a petty pace, Macbeth. Now, Macbeth is my boy (i.e. favorite Shakespeare tragedy) and he certainly has it right that there are fools and poor players all around us strutting and fretting (ahem TheDnldWTFTrumpface ahem). But the very notion of tomorrow brings hope, as one of my OTHER favorite plays of all time reminds us. So, so, so much hope for the wretches whom Macbeth might call "walking shadows" as they contemplate revolution in Les Misérables:

"There's a new world for the winning/Do you hear the people sing?"

When the Electoral College meets tomorrow, will they hear? Will they do the right thing, the moral thing, the Constitutional thing, and use their best judgment to cast their votes, which means casting them so that TheDnldWTFTrumpface does not ascend to the presidency?

While that's happening politically, I also personally have a huge and emotional development tomorrow in my professional life. (No, the electors aren't going to elect me...that I know of!) One era is coming to an end, due in large part to reduction-in-force layoffs that came slamming into one of my gigs, but not entirely due to that, as I have seized upon a blessing-in-disguise opportunity to do some stuff when this particular new little era of mine dawns. AND, just to compound the personal/professional/tomorrow timing of it all, the last month and a half has been a whirlwind, a mighty and fierce whirlwind, of me working two and a half jobs, laying groundwork, and figuring out lots of big stuff, and all this has been happening since Monday, November 7, the first "One Day More," which led us to the horrible Tuesday, November 8 election day or more accurately the horrible Wednesday, November 9 Day After. So for one month and a half I have been in this intense stirring up of life and time (working every day, sometimes two jobs, plus other events, with no time to think but just go go go with eyes on the prize), with big developments, and meanwhile this parallel thing happening of Trumpface and the end of the world and the burgeoning fight for the #ElectoralCollegeExMachina moment we all need and then after a particularly intense last burst of the 36 hours from 11 a.m. Friday through 11 p.m. Saturday where I was just everywhere serving three or more masters and just go go go went went went I came home and rested.

Sleeping deeply.

And waking up today to Facebook memories of Tomorrowland and the imminence of tomorrow, December 19, when one big thing ends in my personal life, AND there is one superbig chance for the whole world in political life.

Sing it, Les Misérables:

"Tomorrow is the judgment day
Tomorrow we'll discover what our god in heaven has in store
One more dawn
One more day
One day more."